Regular estimates of herbage mass can improve profitability of pasture-based dairy systems

Paddock selection is an important component of grazing management and is based on either an estimate of herbage mass, or the interval since last grazing for each paddock. Obtaining estimates of herbage mass to guide grazing management can be a time consuming task. A value proposition could therefore assist farmers in deciding whether to invest resources in obtaining such information. A farm-scale simulation exercise was designed to estimate the effect of three levels of knowledge of individual paddock herbage mass on profitability of two typical pasture-based dairy systems in New Zealand; a medium input system stocked at 3.2 Friesian-Jersey cross bred cows/ha with ~15% imported feed, and a high input system stocked at 4.5 Friesian cows/ha with ~40% imported feed. The three levels of knowledge were: (1) ‘perfect knowledge’, where herbage mass per paddock is known with perfect accuracy, (2) ‘imperfect knowledge’, where herbage mass per paddock is estimated with an average error of 15%, (3) ‘low knowledge’, where herbage mass is not known, and paddocks are selected based on longest time since last grazing. In both systems, grazing management based on imperfect knowledge increased farm operating profit by ~NZ$385/ha at a milk price of NZ$6.33/kg milksolids (fat + protein) compared with low knowledge. Perfect knowledge added a further NZ$155/ha to profit. The main driver of these results is the level of accuracy in daily feed allocation, which increases with improved knowledge of herbage availability. This allows feed supply and demand to be better matched, resulting in less incidence of under- and over-feeding, higher milk production, and more optimal post-grazing residual herbage mass to maximise herbage regrowth.

[1]  Pat Dillon,et al.  A comparison of four methods of herbage mass estimation , 2016 .

[2]  J. Roche,et al.  Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Graeme J. Doole,et al.  Optimising the interrelationship between intake per cow and intake per hectare , 2015 .

[4]  W. J. Fulkerson,et al.  Benefits of accurately allocating feed on a daily basis to dairy cows grazing pasture , 2005 .

[5]  D. Donaghy,et al.  The effect of grazing severity and fertiliser application during winter on herbage regrowth and quality of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) , 2007 .

[6]  D. Donaghy,et al.  Effect of Defoliation Severity on Regrowth and Nutritive Value of Perennial Ryegrass Dominant Swards , 2008 .

[7]  Cameron E. F. Clark,et al.  Original paper: Use of a pasture growth model to estimate herbage mass at a paddock scale and assist management on dairy farms , 2010 .

[8]  R. Monaghan,et al.  Issues and options for future dairy farming in New Zealand , 2007 .

[9]  M. Wastney,et al.  Evaluation of a whole-farm model for pasture-based dairy systems. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Use of a model to optimize the interaction between frequency and severity of intermittent defoliation and to provide a fundamental comparison of the continuous and intermittent defoliation of grass , 1988 .

[11]  P. Moate,et al.  Dry matter intake, nutrient selection and milk production of dairy cows grazing rainfed perennial pastures at different herbage allowances in spring , 1999 .

[12]  B. A. Wood,et al.  Opportunities to improve grazing management , 2014 .

[13]  P. Gregorini,et al.  Incorporating a prediction of postgrazing herbage mass into a whole-farm model for pasture-based dairy systems. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  D. Chapman Using Ecophysiology to Improve Farm Efficiency: Application in Temperate Dairy Grazing Systems , 2016 .

[15]  D. Clark,et al.  Inter-paddock annual dry matter yield variability for dairy farms in the Waikato region of New Zealand , 2010 .