Soil water status mapping and two variable-rate irrigation scenarios

Irrigation is the major user of allocated global freshwaters, and scarcity of freshwater threatens to limit global food supply and ecosystem function—hence the need for decision tools to optimize use of irrigation water. This research shows that variable alluvial soil ideally requires variable placement of water to make the best use of irrigation water during crop growth. Further savings can be made by withholding irrigation during certain growth stages. The spatial variation of soil water supplied to (1) pasture and (2) a maize crop was modelled and mapped by relating high resolution apparent electrical conductivity maps to soil available water holding capacity (AWC) at two contrasting field sites. One field site, a 156-ha pastoral farm, has soil with wide ranging AWCs (116–230 mm m−1); the second field site, a 53-ha maize field, has soil with similar AWCs (161–164 mm m−1). The derived AWC maps were adjusted on a daily basis using a soil water balance prediction model. In addition, real-time hourly logging of soil moisture in the maize field showed a zone where poorly drained soil remained wetter than predicted. Variable-rate irrigation (VRI) scenarios are presented and compared with uniform-rate irrigation scenarios for 3 years of climate data at these two sites. The results show that implementation of VRI would enable significant potential mean annual water saving (21.8% at Site 1; 26.3% at Site 2). Daily soil water status mapping could be used to control a variable rate irrigator.

[1]  Yao-chi Lu,et al.  Economic Feasibility Study of Variable Irrigation of Corn Production in Southeast Coastal Plain , 2005 .

[2]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Uniformity testing of variable-rate center pivot irrigation control systems , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[3]  M. Swaminathan,et al.  Can science and technology feed the world in 2025 , 2007 .

[4]  Kelly R. Thorp,et al.  Simulating the effects of spatially variable irrigation on corn yields, costs, and revenue in Iowa , 2007 .

[5]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Opportunities for conservation with precision irrigation , 2005 .

[6]  D. C. Kincaid,et al.  A VARIABLE FLOW RATE SPRINKLER FOR SITE-SPECIFIC IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT , 2004 .

[7]  M. Kirkham,et al.  Root uptake and transpiration: From measurements and models to sustainable irrigation , 2006 .

[8]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA , 2005 .

[9]  Shaozhong Kang,et al.  An improved water-use efficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation. , 2000 .

[10]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Precise irrigation scheduling for turfgrass using a subsurface electromagnetic soil moisture sensor , 2006 .

[11]  Andreas G. Lazari,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources , 2008 .

[13]  William A. Jury,et al.  The Emerging Global Water Crisis: Managing Scarcity and Conflict Between Water Users , 2007 .

[14]  M. Morgan,et al.  Canterbury strategic water study , 2002 .

[15]  A. Hewitt.  New Zealand soil classification. , 1993 .

[16]  R. J. Hanks.  Model for Predicting Plant Yield as Influenced by Water Use1 , 1974 .

[17]  Ian J. Yule,et al.  Rapid identification of soil textural and management zones using electromagnetic induction sensing of soils , 2004 .

[18]  D. Russo.  A Stochastic Approach to the Crop Yield-Irrigation Relationships in Heterogeneous Soils: I. Analysis of the Field Spatial Variability1 , 1986 .

[19]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[20]  J. A. Millen,et al.  Spatial variation of corn response to irrigation , 2002 .