Association between setting quantified road safety targets and road fatality reduction.

Since the 1980s, many countries have set quantified road safety targets as part of their comprehensive road safety strategies. This paper studies the association between the setting of quantified road safety targets and road fatality reduction over the past two decades. Both aggregate and disaggregate levels of hypothesis tests are performed on data from 14 countries that set road safety targets during the period 1981-1999. A before-and-after analysis of the treatment and comparison groups is conducted, and the results show that the majority of countries with quantified road safety targets experienced a reduction in road fatalities in this period. Overall, the establishment of quantified road safety targets is found to have an appreciable association with an improvement in road safety.

[1]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  A review of the road safety strategy in Hong Kong , 2007 .

[2]  D. Mccornac,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF GOVERNMENT SAFETY POLICIES ON TRAFFIC-RELATED FATALITIES: EMPIRICAL ESTIMATES FROM JAPAN. , 1993 .

[3]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Road Safety Strategies: A Comparative Framework and Case Studies , 2005 .

[4]  Rune Elvik,et al.  How would setting policy priorities according to cost-benefit analyses affect the provision of road safety? , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  J Guria.  An economic evaluation of incremental resources to road safety programmes in New Zealand. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  W S Jessie,et al.  The efficacy of safety policies on traffic fatalities in Singapore. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  R Elvik,et al.  Can injury prevention efforts go too far? Reflections on some possible implications of Vision Zero for road accident fatalities. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  S C Wong,et al.  A qualitative assessment methodology for road safety policy strategies. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[10]  J Guria,et al.  Monitoring performance of road safety programmes in New Zealand. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Jagadish Guria,et al.  An evaluation of a supplementary road safety package. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Richard E. Allsop.  Assessing Risk and Setting Targets in Transport Safety Programmes , 2003 .

[13]  Rune Elvik.  Improving road safety in Norway and Sweden : analysing the efficiency of policy priorities , 2001 .

[14]  J Guria,et al.  Predicting performance of annual safety outcomes. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Becky P Y Loo,et al.  Would relaxing speed limits aggravate safety? A case study of Hong Kong. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[17]  R. Allsop,et al.  TRAVEL SURVEY DATA REQUIRED TO INFORM TRANSPORT SAFETY POLICY AND PRACTICE , 2005 .

[18]  R Elvik,et al.  Quantified road safety targets: a useful tool for policy making? , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Richard E. Allsop.  Strategies and targets for reducing death and injury in road traffic accidents , 1999 .

[20]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[21]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Road Safety - Strategy and Implementation , 2002 .

[22]  Richard E. Allsop.  Road safety work: implementation and monitoring now and pragmatism about the longer term , 2002 .

[23]  Patrick S. McCarthy,et al.  Public policy and highway safety: a city-wide perspective , 1999 .

[24]  Richard E. Allsop.  SOME TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF MOVEMENT OF GOODS BY ROAD , 2003 .

[25]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .