Robustness and accuracy of high speed LC-MS separations for global peptide quantitation and biomarker discovery.

The present work investigates qualitative and quantitative variability for rapid liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses of tryptic digests of total mammalian cell lysate. Experimental variability is characterized in a global manner across technical replicates using label-free quantification software (DeCyder MS 2.0). The effects of a novel time-alignment algorithm are described. Although effective to correct for retention time shifts the time-alignment tool adds only minute benefits for ultra performance (UP)LC-MS data. In differential display experiments, quantitative changes down to 3.5% of the experimental dynamic range could be accurately detected (p<0.001). In 17 min analyses, almost 8500 peptide features were detected following injection of approximately 1 microg of total cytoplasmic digest. Ion intensity coefficient of variance were <15% for the majority (89%) of all detected peaks. Carry-over of double-charged (tryptic peptide) species was very low (<0.26%). Although the number of peptides detected was highly consistent across replicates, only 58% could be matched to all runs (n=5). However, 90% matched to > or =3/5 runs, indicating the importance of replicate runs. The method presented allows high sample throughput which is essential for clinical biomarker discovery. The results are highly encouraging, especially in light of the dynamic range improvements that are presently becoming available on quadrupole time-of-flight instruments.

[1]  J Margolis,et al.  Isoelectric focusing and gradient gel electrophoresis: a two-dimensional technique. , 1970, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  M. Quaglia,et al.  Amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents: requirements for absolute quantification of proteins and peptides. , 2008, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  G. Guiochon,et al.  High peak capacity separations of peptides in reversed-phase gradient elution liquid chromatography on columns packed with porous shell particles. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Michael J MacCoss,et al.  Assessing the dynamic range and peak capacity of nanoflow LC-FAIMS-MS on an ion trap mass spectrometer for proteomics. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  Matej Oresic,et al.  MZmine: toolbox for processing and visualization of mass spectrometry based molecular profile data , 2006, Bioinform..

[8]  M. Ünlü,et al.  Difference gel electrophoresis. A single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[9]  K. Mazanec,et al.  Novel staining‐free proteomic method for simultaneous identification of proteins and determination of their pI values by using low‐molecular‐mass pI markers , 2007, Electrophoresis.

[10]  Iain Beattie,et al.  Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[11]  Joachim Klose,et al.  Two‐dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: An updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome , 1995, Electrophoresis.

[12]  G. Siuzdak,et al.  Nonlinear data alignment for UPLC-MS and HPLC-MS based metabolomics: quantitative analysis of endogenous and exogenous metabolites in human serum. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Xudong Yao,et al.  Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: Tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[14]  K. Mazanec,et al.  Mass spectrometric characterization of low-molecular-mass color pI markers and their use for direct determination of pI value of proteins. , 2006, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[15]  J. Henion,et al.  Electrospray device for coupling microscale separations and other miniaturized devices with electrospray mass spectrometry. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  John D. Venable,et al.  Automated ultra-high-pressure multidimensional protein identification technology (UHP-MudPIT) for improved peptide identification of proteomic samples. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  B. Cargile,et al.  An alternative to tandem mass spectrometry: isoelectric point and accurate mass for the identification of peptides. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  H. Yin,et al.  Microfluidic chip for peptide analysis with an integrated HPLC column, sample enrichment column, and nanoelectrospray tip. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.