3-D survey with a modular ground-penetrating radar system at the Roman town Mariana (Corsica)

Recently, the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) arrays with a large number of antenna elements in a fixed configuration has become more common. The investment needed for these systems is significant. Although gradually expandable modular systems, consisting of antennas which can be used independently, do not match the fast acquisition of detailed datasets by means of multi-channel arrays, they can help finding a compromise between increased acquisition speed and (limited) resources. In modular systems, the separation between transmitter-receiver pairs is often larger than the sampling distance prescribed by the Nyquist theorem. As a consequence, additional profiles have to be recorded in between, which requires a high positioning precision. As a completely identical response for the different antennas in an array is difficult to achieve, stripes can occur in the horizontal slices, especially when ringing occurs. This complicates the interpretation of features in the direction of the survey lines. In this paper, a threedimensional frequency-wavenumber filter is proposed, consisting in a combination of a circular filter and a fan filter. The application of this filter to GPR data collected at the Roman town Mariana (Corsica, France) showed a reduction of the stripe patterns, allowing a more reliable characterization of subtle archaeological structures.

[1]  F. Vermeulen,et al.  GPR survey at the Roman town of Mariana (Corsica) , 2009 .

[2]  Gianfranco Morelli,et al.  3-D high-resolution multi-channel radar investigation of a Roman village in Northern Italy , 2009 .

[3]  J. Leckebusch Use of antenna arrays for GPR surveying in archaeology , 2005 .

[4]  T. Quarta,et al.  Improvement in GPR coherent noise attenuation using τ-p and wavelet transforms , 2004 .

[5]  Erica Utsi GPR as an imaging device: Some problems & potential solutions , 2010, Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[6]  J. Leckebusch Comparison of a stepped‐frequency continuous wave and a pulsed GPR system , 2011 .

[7]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Three-dimensional multicomponent georadar imaging of sedimentary structures , 2006 .

[8]  Andy Payne,et al.  Stepped frequency ground‐penetrating radar survey with a multi‐element array antenna: Results from field application on archaeological sites , 2010 .

[9]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  Integration of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Laser Position Sensors for Real-Time 3-D Data Fusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Erich D. Guy,et al.  Pitfalls in GPR data interpretation: Differentiating stratigraphy and buried objects from periodic antenna and target effects , 2000 .

[11]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Semiautomated georadar data acquisition in three dimensions , 1999 .

[12]  Seong-Jun Cho,et al.  Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing , 2007 .

[13]  Jaana Gustafsson,et al.  Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system , 2010 .