Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: a trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005.

OBJECTIVE The surgical treatment of valvular heart disease has changed significantly in the past decade with more mitral valves being repaired and tissue valves implanted in the aortic position. The National Inpatient Sample was used to document national trends of primary isolated aortic and mitral valve surgical procedures. METHODS Subjects were adult patients who had an isolated aortic or mitral valve repair or replacement in the United States. Estimated institution cost and total billed charges data were provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. RESULTS From 1998 to 2005, an estimated 330,000 aortic or mitral valve procedures were performed in the United States (repair, n = 46,342; replacement, n = 287,989). Since 1998, annual valve repair or replacement procedures increased 186.6% and 12.6%, respectively. Aortic valve repair or replacement procedures increased 102.5% and 28.0%, respectively, with an increased percentage for repairs from 2.0% in 1998 to 3.1% in 2005. Mitral valve repair procedures increased from 18.9% in 1998 to 45.8% in 2005, with mitral replacements decreasing 17.2% over the same period. Since 1998, the total hospital billed charges for aortic valve repair procedures increased 80.6% and aortic valve replacement procedures 90.4%; mitral valve repair procedures increased from 37.8%, replacement 42.0%. Annual increases in estimated institution cost increased for both aortic and mitral procedures on average 8% to 9%. CONCLUSION During the last decade the practice of valve surgery has changed significantly. The surgical treatment for mitral disease has transitioned to primarily one of repair, not replacement, with the use of bioprostheses more than doubled. For the aortic position, the primary procedure remained valve replacement with bioprosthesis being the valve of choice. Regardless of valve disease, institutional costs and charges for the surgical treatment have greatly outpaced physician reimbursement.

[1]  T. David,et al.  An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  G Chatellier,et al.  Very Long-Term Results (More Than 20 Years) of Valve Repair With Carpentier’s Techniques in Nonrheumatic Mitral Valve Insufficiency , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  V. Chan,et al.  Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in the elderly: an introductory study. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  A. Speir,et al.  Institutional and national trends in isolated mitral valve surgery over the past decade , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.

[7]  Gerhard Poelzl,et al.  Mitral valve repair provides improved outcome over replacement in active infective endocarditis. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  T. Carrel,et al.  Quality of life after mitral valve surgery: differences between reconstruction and replacement. , 2003, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[9]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  M. Ruel,et al.  Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age , 2007, Circulation.

[11]  S E Kowalski,et al.  Mitral valve prolapse , 1985, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.

[12]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Valve-preserving replacement of the ascending aorta: remodeling versus reimplantation. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  G. Lip,et al.  A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  E. Savage,et al.  Use of mitral valve repair: analysis of contemporary United States experience reported to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  The value of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: an economic analysis. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Very Long-Term Survival and Durability of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Valve Prolapse , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Mitral valve repair and replacement in endocarditis: a systematic review of literature. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Mitral valve repair versus replacement for isolated non-ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction. A long-term follow-up echocardiography study. , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  C. Tribble,et al.  Mitral Repair Is Superior to Replacement When Associated With Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[21]  W G Henderson,et al.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  J. Borer,et al.  The epidemiology of valvular heart disease: a growing public health problem. , 2006, Heart failure clinics.

[23]  K. Kuwaki,et al.  Mitral valve repair versus replacement in simultaneous mitral and aortic valve surgery for rheumatic disease. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  P. Austin,et al.  Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  R. Weigel,et al.  Physician reimbursement for general surgical procedures in the last century: 1906-2006. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  E. Jones,et al.  Ten-year trends in heart valve replacement operations. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Aortic valve repair versus replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. , 2003, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[28]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[29]  S. Money,et al.  A Decade of Decline: An Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement for Vascular Surgical Procedures , 2002, Annals of Vascular Surgery.

[30]  Pantpis Sakornpant,et al.  First National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report , 2011 .