Costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms to reduce the increasing workload of radiologists in daily clinical practice. Mammography is the most widely used imaging modality for early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 1389 mammograms of consecutive patients were evaluated by two technologists trained in mammogram interpretation. The costs and effects of four different experimental strategies of prereading mammograms by technologists were analyzed by decision analytic modeling and compared with the conventional strategy of standard evaluation by the radiologist on duty. Results: Overall, the employment of technologists in this patient population resulted in a potential time saving up to 73 percent (1019/1389) for the radiologist. No additional false-negative imaging results were found as compared to the conventional strategy. The total diagnostic costs in the conventional strategy were determined at €150,602. The experimental strategies resulted in cost savings up to 17.2 percent (range, €122,494–€139,781). Conclusions: The employment of technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population could be effective to reduce the workload of radiologists without jeopardizing the detection of malignancies. Furthermore, diagnostic costs can be reduced considerably.

[1]  Alfons G H Kessels,et al.  The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  E. Denton,et al.  Can radiographers read screening mammograms? , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[3]  E. Denton,et al.  Can Radiographers Read Screening Mammograms?: Response , 2003 .

[4]  J. Severens,et al.  Clinical impact of the use of additional ultrasonography in diagnostic breast imaging , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  B. Haward,et al.  Effect on survival of delays in referral of patients with breast-cancer symptoms: a retrospective analysis , 1999, The Lancet.

[6]  R Pauli,et al.  Comparison of Radiographer/Radiologist Double Film Reading with Single Reading in Breast Cancer Screening , 1996, Journal of medical screening.

[7]  Keats Te Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants , 1988 .

[8]  J. Henderson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF INTERPRETATION OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAMS BY A RADIOGRAPHER, A DOCTOR AND A RADIOLOGIST: RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS , 1991, The British journal of clinical practice.

[9]  T. Keats,et al.  Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  P. Nelemans,et al.  Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. , 2008, Breast.

[11]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Costs and effects of ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Gerrit Smit,et al.  Richtlijn 'screening en diagnostiek van het mammacarcinoom' (herziening). , 2008 .

[13]  S. Dische,et al.  Delay in diagnosis in breast cancer , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  R. Pommier,et al.  The relationships among clinician delay of diagnosis of breast cancer and tumor size, nodal status, and stage. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[15]  J M Tonita,et al.  Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. , 1999, Radiology.