Examining dual accounting systems in Europe

After adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for consolidated financial statements by European-listed companies, a number of European countries still require the use of local standards in the preparation of legal entity financial statements. This study investigates whether this requirement can be explained by a low demand for high-quality financial reporting and an orientation of accounting toward the fulfilment of regulatory needs in these countries. Specifically, using accounting quality as an indicator of the focus of accounting on capital providers' needs, we compare accounting quality between countries permitting and prohibiting the use of IFRS in individual financial statements. Consistent with our expectations, we find that countries requiring the use of local standards in the preparation of legal entity financial statements exhibit a significantly lower level of accounting quality, both prior to and after IFRS adoption. We interpret these results as evidence that these countries have local standards more oriented toward the satisfaction of regulatory needs, rather than investors' needs. Furthermore, since differences in accounting quality persist after the implementation of IFRS, results suggest that firms in these countries face a lower demand for high-quality financial reporting.

[1]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View , 2001 .

[2]  Hans B. Christensen,et al.  Cross-sectional variation in the economic consequences of international accounting harmonization: The case of mandatory IFRS adoption in the UK ☆ , 2007 .

[3]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[4]  Mark Lang,et al.  THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF GERMAN ACCOUNTING MEASURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[5]  Gregory S. Miller,et al.  Accounting Choice, Home Bias, and Us Investment in Non-Us Firms , 2004 .

[6]  Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes,et al.  What Works in Securities Laws? , 2003 .

[7]  Christian Leuz,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure , 1999 .

[8]  Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison , 2002 .

[9]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality , 2005 .

[10]  W. Buijink,et al.  Voluntary adoption of non-local GAAP in the European Union: A study of determinants and consequences , 2005 .

[11]  Hollis Ashbaugh,et al.  Non-US Firms' Accounting Standard Choices , 2001 .

[12]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research , 2009 .

[13]  S. Carmona,et al.  On the global acceptance of IAS/IFRS accounting standards: The logic and implications of the principles-based system , 2008 .

[14]  C. Nobes.  Towards a General Model of the Reasons for International Differences in Financial Reporting , 1998 .

[15]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings , 1999 .

[16]  Mark Lang,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ACCOUNTING DIVERSITY - EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN-UNION , 1994 .

[17]  Mark Lang,et al.  Earnings Management and Cross Listing: Are Reconciled Earnings Comparable to Us Earnings? , 2005 .

[18]  Ole-Kristian Hope,et al.  Empirical Evidence on Jurisdictions that Adopt IFRS , 2006 .

[19]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Legal Determinants of External Finance , 1997 .

[20]  Yuan Ding,et al.  Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture , 2005 .

[21]  Ole‐Kristian Hope,et al.  Differences between Domestic Accounting Standards and IAS: Measurement, Determinants and Implications , 2006 .

[22]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: AN INTERNATIONAL ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[23]  Ann Gaeremynck,et al.  Attribute Differences between Us Gaap and IFRS Earnings: An Exploratory Study , 2006 .

[24]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[25]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Law and Finance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Country-Specific Factors Related to Financial Reporting and the Value Relevance of Accounting Data , 1999 .

[27]  Araceli Mora,et al.  Evaluating the statistical significance of de facto accounting harmonization: a study of European global players , 2000 .

[28]  Patricia M. Dechow.  Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals , 1994 .

[29]  C. Leuz,et al.  Capital Market Effects of Mandatory IFRS Reporting in the EU: Empirical Evidence , 2007 .

[30]  K. Schipper,et al.  Implications of Accounting Research for the SEC's Consideration of International Accounting Standards for U.S. Securities Offerings , 1999 .

[31]  S. McLeay,et al.  Country Effects and Sector Effects on the Harmonization of Accounting Policy Choice , 2007 .

[32]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Home Bias, Foreign Mutual Fund Holdings, and the Voluntary Adoption of International Accounting Standards , 2007 .

[33]  Eva K. Jermakowicz,et al.  Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies , 2006 .

[34]  Holger Daske,et al.  International Financial Reporting Standards and Experts' Perceptions of Disclosure Quality , 2006 .

[35]  Ashok Robin,et al.  Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries, and Implications for Acceptance of IAS , 2000 .

[36]  Joachim Gassen,et al.  Applying IFRS in Germany: Determinants and Consequences , 2006 .

[37]  Eli Bartov,et al.  Comparative Value Relevance Among German, U.S. And International Accounting Standards: A German Stock Market Perspective , 2002 .

[38]  C. Nobes.  GAAP 2001 : a survey of national accounting rules benchmarked against international accounting standards , 2001 .

[39]  Francis E. Warnock,et al.  Information Costs and Home Bias: An Analysis of U.S. Holdings of Foreign Equities , 2001 .

[40]  Corporate Data and Future Cash Flows , 2004 .

[41]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany , 2007 .

[42]  Mark Tessler,et al.  DETERMINANTS, AND CONSEQUENCES , 1988 .

[43]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions , 2005 .

[44]  R. Ball,et al.  EARNINGS QUALITY IN UK PRIVATE FIRMS: COMPARATIVE LOSS RECOGNITION TIMELINESS , 2005 .

[45]  Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows , 1999 .

[46]  G. Whittington,et al.  The harmonization of accounting within the EU , 1994 .

[47]  G. López‐Espinosa,et al.  Accounting measures and international pricing models: Justifying accounting homogeneity , 2008 .

[48]  Kee-Hong Bae,et al.  International GAAP Differences: The Impact on Foreign Analysts , 2008 .

[49]  David Burgstahler,et al.  The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms , 2004 .

[50]  Edward L. Maydew,et al.  An unintended consequence of book-tax conformity: A loss of earnings informativeness , 2008 .

[51]  G. Whittington.  The adoption of International Accounting Standards in the European Union , 2005 .

[52]  J. Cramer,et al.  Mean and variance of R2 in small and moderate samples , 1987 .

[53]  Morton Pincus,et al.  Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings , 2000 .

[54]  Hervé Stolowy,et al.  Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption , 2008 .