Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria

Received: October 2005 Accepted: October 2006 This paper deals with port competition and port selection for cargo to/from Austria. Austria is located centrally in Europe and seaports in at least five countries are used for imports and exports. Changes of market shares over time of different ports serving Austria are analysed. Switching of cargo between ports does take place, but friction prevents instantaneous switching. Consequently, it took a decade for the new potential of inland shipping to Austria, resulting from the opening of the Rhine-Main-Donau canal, was fully realised. A survey was held to analyse port choice decisions of two types of decision makers: shippers and forwarders. These results show shippers and forwarders have similar views on port selection, but shippers have a less price-elastic demand.

[1]  James Bird,et al.  The Major Seaports of the United Kingdom , 1963 .

[2]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Transhipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case , 2003 .

[3]  M. Hesse,et al.  The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution , 2004 .

[4]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Freight Distribution and the Sub-harborization of Port Terminals , 2004 .

[5]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland access regimes in seaports , 2003, Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport - Scientific Papers in Transportation.

[6]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PORT PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY , 1995 .

[7]  H. Haralambides.  Competition, Excess Capacity, and the Pricing of Port Infrastructure , 2002 .

[8]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures , 2002 .

[9]  H. Arjen van Klink,et al.  Gateways and intermodalism , 1998 .

[10]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Port co-opetition in concept and practice , 2003 .

[11]  Xavier Fageda.  LOAD CENTRES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN PORT RANGE. PORTS HUB AND PORTS GATEWAY , 2000 .

[12]  A. J. Sargent.  Seaports and Hinterlands , 1939 .

[13]  Piyush Tiwari,et al.  CONTAINERIZED CARGO SHIPPER'S BEHAVIOR IN CHINA: A DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[14]  André Vigarie.  L'evolution de la notion d'arriere-pays en economie portuaire , 2004 .

[15]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  FREIGHT, GATEWAYS AND MEGA-URBAN REGIONS: THE LOGISTICAL INTEGRATION OF THE BOSTWASH CORRIDOR1: FREIGHT, GATEWAYS AND MEGA-URBAN REGIONS , 2004 .

[16]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  A disaggregate analysis of port selection , 2004 .

[17]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Essays on Strategy Analysis for Seaports , 2001 .

[18]  Mk Fung,et al.  The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges: an empirical study , 2003 .

[19]  Paul R. Murphy,et al.  PORT SELECTION CRITERIA: AN APPLICATION OF A TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FRAMEWORK , 1992 .

[20]  S J Meyrick,et al.  CARRIER SELECTION IN A RO/RO FERRY TRADE. , 1992 .

[21]  Chandra Lalwani,et al.  MODELLING PORT/FERRY CHOICE IN RORO FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION , 2002 .

[22]  P. W. De Langen.  Time Centrality in Transport , 1999 .