Inverse modeling of surface-water discharge to achieve restoration salinity performance measures in Florida Bay, Florida

Summary The use of numerical modeling to evaluate regional water-management practices involves the simulation of various alternative water-delivery scenarios, which typically are designed intuitively rather than analytically. These scenario simulations are used to analyze how specific water-management practices affect factors such as water levels, flows, and salinities. In lieu of testing a variety of scenario simulations in a trial-and-error manner, an optimization technique may be used to more precisely and directly define good water-management alternatives. A numerical model application in the coastal regions of Florida Bay and Everglades National Park (ENP), representing the surface- and ground-water hydrology for the region, is a good example of a tool used to evaluate restoration scenarios. The Southern Inland and Coastal System (SICS) model simulates this area with a two-dimensional hydrodynamic surface-water model and a three-dimensional ground-water model, linked to represent the interaction of the two systems with salinity transport. This coastal wetland environment is of great interest in restoration efforts, and the SICS model is used to analyze the effects of alternative water-management scenarios. The SICS model is run within an inverse modeling program called UCODE. In this application, UCODE adjusts the regulated inflows to ENP while SICS is run iteratively. UCODE creates parameters that define inflow within an allowable range for the SICS model based on SICS model output statistics, with the objective of matching user-defined target salinities that meet ecosystem restoration criteria. Preliminary results obtained using two different parameterization methods illustrate the ability of the model to achieve the goals of adjusting the range and reducing the variance of salinity values in the target area. The salinity variance in the primary zone of interest was reduced from an original value of 0.509 psu2 to values 0.418 psu2 and 0.342 psu2 using different methods. Simulations with one, two, and three target areas indicate that optimization is limited near model boundaries and the target location nearest the tidal boundary may not be improved. These experiments indicate that this method can be useful for designing water-delivery schemes to achieve certain water-quality objectives. Additionally, this approach avoids much of the intuitive type of experimentation with different flow schemes that has often been used to develop restoration scenarios.

[1]  E. Swain,et al.  Simulation of Integrated Surface-Water/Ground-Water Flow and Salinity for a Coastal Wetland and Adjacent Estuary , 2005 .

[2]  R. Schaffranek Section 1. Simulation of surface-water integrated flow and transport in two-dimensions: SWIFT2D user's manual , 2004 .

[3]  S. Adams Biological Indicators of Stress in Fish , 1990 .

[4]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design , 1993 .

[5]  Anderson L. Ward,et al.  Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters of a Field Drainage Experiment Using Inverse Techniques , 2003 .

[6]  Paul D. Thorne,et al.  Transient Inverse Calibration of Hanford Site-Wide Groundwater Model to Hanford Operational Impacts - 1943 to 1996 , 2001 .

[7]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  UCODE_2005 and six other computer codes for universal sensitivity analysis, calibration, and uncertainty evaluation constructed using the JUPITER API , 2006 .

[8]  E. Poeter,et al.  Documentation of UCODE; a computer code for universal inverse modeling , 1998 .

[9]  R. Garvine,et al.  Hydrologic modeling as a predictive basis for ecological restoration of salt marshes , 1995 .

[10]  E. Coiacetto A model for use in the management of coastal wetlands , 1996 .

[11]  Barbara S. Minsker,et al.  Quantifying the effects of uncertainty on optimal groundwater bioremediation policies , 1998 .

[12]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods , 1992 .

[13]  K. Eckhardt,et al.  Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects , 2003 .

[14]  Chunmiao Zheng,et al.  A Field Demonstration of the Simulation Optimization Approach for Remediation System Design , 2002, Ground water.

[15]  Stephen C. Newbold INTEGRATED MODELING FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES AND SPATIAL EFFECTS1 , 2002 .

[16]  R. Hunt,et al.  Simulation of the recharge area for Frederick Springs, Dane County, Wisconsin , 2000 .

[17]  Robert A. Marryott,et al.  Optimal Groundwater Management: 1. Simulated Annealing , 1991 .

[18]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Convergence of Stochastic Optimization and Decision Analysis in the Engineering Design of Aquifer Remediation , 1999 .

[19]  C. Zheng,et al.  GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS AND SIMULATED ANNEALING: FORMULATION AND COMPARISON 1 , 1998 .