GPS/INS/Pseudolite Integration: Concepts, Simulation and Testing

Traditionally, Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) provide positioning and attitude information for the guidance (and perhaps control) of a wide range of moving platforms in the air, at sea, or on the ground. However, the timedependent growth of systematic errors is a major concern in INS applications. Precise satellite measurements are ideally suited for the calibration of INS systematic errors. Therefore, integrated INS and GPS (and/or Glonass) systems have been developed, which can provide highrate precise positioning and attitude information. The major drawback of existing systems is that their performance decreases under difficult operational conditions, for example when satellite signals are obstructed for extended periods of time. In the worst situations, such as underground and inside buildings, the satellite signals may be completely lost. In circumstances where satellite signals are unavailable, it may be possible to maintain availability of range measurements for use in calibrating the INS systematic errors by placing 'pseudosatellites' (pseudolites) at appropriate locations. Thus, an augmentation of existing systems with ranging signals from ground-based pseudolites would result in a new design that could address the problems of signal availability. In fact, integrated GPS/INS/Pseudolite systems are, in principle, an ideal option for seamless indoor-outdoor positioning and attitude determination. This paper discusses the concept of GPS/INS/Pseudolite integration in detail. Both system performance simulation and experimental results are presented to demonstrate the feasibility of such an integrated system.

[1]  Toshiaki Tsujii,et al.  Pseudolite applications in positioning and navigation: Modelling and geometric analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Chris Rizos,et al.  成層圏プラットフォームを用いた擬似 GPS 衛星による航法測位サービスについて , 2002 .

[3]  Meir Pachter,et al.  GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF A GPS-BASED NAVIGATION REFERENCE SYSTEM , 1997 .

[4]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[5]  K. P. Schwarz,et al.  Testing a decentralized filter for GPS/INS integration , 1990, IEEE Symposium on Position Location and Navigation. A Decade of Excellence in the Navigation Sciences.

[6]  Michael Moore,et al.  Integrating GPS and Pseudolite Signals for Position and Attitude Determination: Theoretical Analysis and Experiment Results , 2000 .

[7]  D. A. Grejner-Brzezinska,et al.  GPS error modeling and OTF ambiguity resolution for high-accuracy GPS/INS integrated system , 1998 .

[8]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Development of Indoor Navigation System using Asynchronous Pseudolites , 2000 .

[9]  Chris Rizos,et al.  A Navigation / Positioning Service Based on Pseudolites Installed on Stratospheric Airships , 2001 .

[10]  I. Bar-Itzhack,et al.  Control theoretic approach to inertial navigation systems , 1988 .

[11]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Global positioning system : theory and applications , 1996 .

[12]  John Weston,et al.  Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology , 1997 .

[13]  Gérard Lachapelle,et al.  Development and Testing of a Mobile Pseudolite Concept for Precise Positioning , 1995 .

[14]  Edward A. LeMaster,et al.  Mars Exploration Using Self-Calibrating Pseudolite Arrays , 1998 .

[15]  Michael Moore,et al.  Pseudo-satellites Integration for Precise Positioning , 2001 .

[16]  Michael S. Braasch,et al.  GPS Interferometric Attitude and Heading Determination: Initial Flight Test Results , 1991 .