Preparation and properties of ceramic foam catalyst supports

Ceramic foams are preformed materials used extensively as filters, advanced burners, diffusers and mixers, but catalytic applications are now beginning to appear. These include catalytic solar receivers, partial oxidation, catalytic combustion, and diesel exhaust catalytic filters. The foams are sponge-like porous structures and are made by filling flexible open-cell organic polymer foams with slurries of ceramic particles such as alpha alumina, zirconia, silicon nitride, etc.. The plastic is burned off and the ceramic sintered to yield either a positive or negative replica of the original foam depending on exact loading procedures. Mega-pore openings range from 0.02 to 1.5 mm, apparent densities from 0.5 to 1.5 g cm −3 , porosities from 40 to 85%, and the number of pores per cm from 4 to 30. With appropriate moulding or machining of the plastic foam, the ceramic may be fabricated in any shape or size. Megaporosity enhances turbulence in gases flowing through the foam and produces better mixing with lower pressure drop. The foam may be impregnated with catalytic agents, with or without an appropriate washcoat. Although pressure drop correlations follow the Ergun equation, the high porosity gives much lower pressure drop than equivalent beds of particles. Mass transfer follows standard correlations but turbulent flow is seen at much lower flow rates. Heat transfer is enhanced by the superior conductivity of the web structure. These feature combine to make ceramic foams attractive possibilities for many applications. The only disadvantage is the relatively low strength, a feature which may be controlled in some cases.

[1]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Modelling of the methane steam reforming reactor with large-pore catalysts , 1992 .

[2]  T. Otowa,et al.  Catalytic combustion of benzene-soot captured on ceramic foam matrix , 1985 .

[3]  K. Miller,et al.  Low density ceramics fabricated from reticulated polymer substrates , 1987 .

[4]  R. D. Skocypec,et al.  Analysis of catalytically enhanced solar absorption chemical reactors , 1989 .

[5]  A. Philipse,et al.  Non‐Darcian Airflow through Ceramic Foams , 1991 .

[6]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[7]  J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of a sodium heat pipe reforming reactor , 1988 .

[8]  D. J. Green,et al.  Fracture behavior of open-cell ceramics , 1989 .

[9]  D. J. Green,et al.  Elastic behavior of open-cell alumina , 1987 .

[10]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Effect of intraparticle convection on the steady-state behavior of fixed-bed catalytic reactors , 1990 .

[11]  R. Clift,et al.  Rigid ceramic media for filtering hot gases. , 1989 .

[12]  L. L. Vasil'ev,et al.  Porous heat exchangers-classification, construction, application , 1984 .

[13]  R. D. Skocypec,et al.  A direct absorber reactor/receiver for solar thermal applications , 1990 .

[14]  J. Richardson,et al.  Carbon dioxide reforming of methane with supported rhodium , 1990 .

[15]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Production of Syngas by Direct Catalytic Oxidation of Methane , 1993, Science.

[16]  Nir Avinoam,et al.  Simultaneous intraparticle forced convection, diffusion and reaction in a porous catalyst , 1977 .

[17]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Intraparticle‐forced convection effect in catalyst diffusivity measurements and reactor design , 1982 .

[18]  D. Cresswell Intra-particle convection: Its measurement and effect on catalyst activity and selectivity , 1985 .

[19]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Comparison of monolith-supported metals for the direct oxidation of methane to syngas , 1994 .

[20]  R. Viskanta,et al.  Experimental determination of the volumetric heat transfer coefficient between stream of air and ceramic foam , 1993 .

[21]  T. Otowa,et al.  Catalytic combustion of methane over composite catalysts supported on a ceramic foam. , 1985 .

[22]  H. Sano,et al.  Catalytic combustion of hydrogen—II. An experimental investigation of fundamental conditions for burner design , 1982 .

[23]  R. D. Skocypec,et al.  Analysis of Catalytically Enhanced Solar Absorption Chemical Reactors: Part II—Predicted Characteristics of a 100 kWchemical Reactor , 1992 .

[24]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Ethylene formation by oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over monoliths at very short contact times , 1993 .