Selected methodological and practical aspects of the multi-criteria method PVM

Abstract In multi-criteria decision support methods a significant participation of the decision maker is required. The obtained assessment is subjective, and the decision-making process is usually difficult to automate. Limiting interaction with the decision-maker, while maintaining the characteristics of multi-criteria analysis seems to be a desirable direction of methodological research. One of the solutions going in this direction is the original multi-criteria PVM method. The applicability of the method has been verified in the context of research on the assessment of EU countries in terms of ensuring healthy living conditions.

[1]  Benedetto Matarazzo,et al.  Preference ranking global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (Pragma) , 1988 .

[2]  Antonieta Lima,et al.  MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODELS: AN OVERVIEW ON ELECTRE METHODS , 2011 .

[3]  Agnieszka Konys,et al.  An Ontology-Based Knowledge Modelling for a Sustainability Assessment Domain , 2018 .

[4]  M. Roubens.  Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making , 1982 .

[5]  Jarosław Jankowski,et al.  An Index to Measure the Sustainable Information Society: The Polish Households Case , 2018, Sustainability.

[6]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Group Decision-Making for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based on Characteristic Objects Method , 2017, Symmetry.

[7]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Decision Making with Uncertainty Using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support for planning and evaluation of performance of viral marketing campaigns in social networks , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  M. Piwowarski,et al.  Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European Union Countries , 2018, Sustainability.

[11]  Jean-Claude Vansnick.  On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach) , 1986 .

[12]  Mariusz Borawski.  MODELING USERS' PREFERENCES IN THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM , 2014 .

[13]  G. Fliedner,et al.  Comparison of the REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process , 1995 .

[14]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection , 2018, Omega.

[15]  J. Sachs.  From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals , 2012, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Siskos.  Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making , 1982 .

[17]  S. MacFeely.  Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland? , 2017 .

[18]  Piwowarski Mateusz,et al.  TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries , 2018 .