Safeguarded Teleoperation for Lunar Rovers: From Human Factors to Field Trials

In this paper we present recent advances in developing and validating the safeguarded teleoperation approach to time-delayed remote driving. This approach shares control of the rover using a command fusion strategy: In benign situations, users remotely drive the rover; in hazardous situations, a safeguarding system running on-board the rover overwrites user commands to ensure vehicle safety. This strategy satisfies users, because it allows them to drive (except in hazardous situations), while maintaining the integrity of the rover and mission. We present results from experiments on untrained teleoperators with and without safeguarding, which reveal needs to be met by future user interfaces. We describe three technical advances in safeguarding: improving the accuracy of dead reckoning by a factor of 2, speeding up the controller by a factor of 18, and developing an area-based rather than a path-based obstacle avoidance planner in order to circumvent map merging problems. Finally, we discuss a field trial validating the approach in a 10 km traverse, demonstrating the effectiveness of safeguarding, even with malicious drivers.

[1]  Richard A. Newman TIME LAG CONSIDERATION IN OPERATOR CONTROL OF LUNAR VEHICLES FROM EARTH , 1963 .

[2]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Lunar base construction robots , 1990, EEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications.

[3]  Anthony Stentz,et al.  The Navlab system for mobile robot navigation , 1990 .

[4]  David Lavery,et al.  Navigation of military and space unmanned ground vehicles in unstructured terrains , 1991 .

[5]  Charles E. Thorpe,et al.  STRIPE: Supervised TeleRobotics Using Incremental Polygonal Earth Geometry , 1993 .

[6]  Eric Krotkov,et al.  Lunar rover technology demonstrations with Dante and Ratler , 1994 .

[7]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Planetary exploration by a mobile robot: Mission teleprogramming and autonomous navigation , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[8]  M. Lamboley,et al.  Marsokhod: Autonomous navigation tests on a Mars-like terrain , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[9]  LAURENCE BOISSIER,et al.  Rover demonstrator for moon exploration , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[10]  J. Matijevic,et al.  Mars Pathfinder Microrover , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[11]  William Whittaker,et al.  Experience with rover navigation for lunar-like terrains , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Stereo perception and dead reckoning for a prototype lunar rover , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[13]  Pierrick Grandjean,et al.  Fast cross-country navigation on fair terrains , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Erann Gat,et al.  Mars microrover navigation: performance evaluation and enhancement , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[15]  Eric Krotkov,et al.  Dead reckoning for a lunar rover on uneven terrain , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Alonzo Kelly,et al.  An intelligent, predictive control approach to the high-speed cross-country autonomous navigation problem , 1996 .

[17]  Santosh Mathan,et al.  Efficacy of a predictive display, steering device, and vehicle body representation in the operation of a lunar vehicle , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[18]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Perception, Planning, and Control for Autonomous Walking With the Ambler Planetary Rover , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Mixed-Mode Control of Navigation for a Lunar Rover , 1999 .