Subspace analysis and optimization for AAM based face alignment

Active appearance models (AAM) is very powerful for extracting objects, e.g. faces, from images. It is composed of two parts: the AAM subspace model and the AAM search. While these two parts are closely correlated, existing efforts treated them separately and had not considered how to optimize them overall. In this paper, an approach is proposed to optimize the subspace model while considering the search procedure. We first perform a subspace error analysis, and then to minimize the AAM error we propose an approach which optimizes the subspace model according to the search procedure. For the subspace error analysis, we decomposed the subspace error into two parts, which are introduced by the subspace model and the search procedure respectively. This decomposition shows that the optimal results of AAM can be achieved only by optimizing both of them jointly rather than separately. Furthermore, based on this error decomposition, we develop a method to find the optimal subspace model according to the search procedure by considering both the two decomposed errors. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can find the optimal AAM subspace model rapidly and improve the performance of AAM significantly.

[1]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[3]  A. Martínez,et al.  The AR face databasae , 1998 .

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Comparing Variations on the Active Appearance Model Algorithm , 2002, BMVC.

[5]  R. Fildes Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B): Gary K. Grunwald, Adrian E. Raftery and Peter Guttorp, 1993, “Time series of continuous proportions”, 55, 103–116.☆ , 1993 .

[6]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Statistical models of appearance for computer vision , 1999 .

[7]  Dana Ron,et al.  An experimental and theoretical comparison of model selection methods , 1995, COLT '95.

[8]  Simon Baker,et al.  Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[9]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Interpreting face images using active appearance models , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[10]  Bjarne K. Ersbøll,et al.  FAME-a flexible appearance modeling environment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[12]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Jörgen Ahlberg Using the active appearance algorithm for face and facial feature tracking , 2001, Proceedings IEEE ICCV Workshop on Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems.

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Direct appearance models , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[16]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Constrained active appearance models , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.