Breakup prediction under uncertainty: Application to upper stage controlled reentries from GTO orbit

Abstract More and more human-made space objects re-enter the atmosphere, and yet the risk for human populations remains often unknown because predicting their reentry trajectories is formidably complex. While falling back on Earth, the space object absorbs large amounts of thermal energy that affects its structural integrity. It undergoes strong aerodynamic forces and heating that lead to one or several breakups. Breakup events have a critical influence on the rest of the trajectory but are extremely challenging to predict and subject to uncertainties. In this work, we present an original model for robustly predicting the breakup of a reentering space object. This model is composed of a set of individual solvers that are coupled together such as each solver resolves a specific aspect of this multiphysics problem. This paper deals with two levels of uncertainties. The first level is the stochastic modeling of the breakup while the second level is the statistical characterization of the model input uncertainties. The framework provides robust estimates of the quantities of interest and quantitative sensitivity analysis. The objective is twofold: first to compute a robust estimate of the breakup distribution and secondly to identify the main uncertainties in the quantities of interest. Due to the significant computational cost, we use an efficient framework particularly suited to multiple solver predictions for the uncertainty quantification analysis. Then, we illustrate the breakup model for the controlled reentry of an upper stage deorbited from a Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO), which is a classical Ariane mission.

[1]  Edmondo Minisci,et al.  Analysis of the de-orbiting and re-entry of space objects with high area to mass ratio , 2016 .

[2]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[3]  N. Dias Derivation of the French Space Operation Act requirements in the specifications of the future European Launcher Ariane 6 , 2018 .

[4]  N. Cressie The origins of kriging , 1990 .

[5]  Peng Chen,et al.  Uncertainty propagation using infinite mixture of Gaussian processes and variational Bayesian inference , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  T. Lips,et al.  a Debris Risk Assessment Tool Supporting Mitigation Guidelines , 2005 .

[7]  I. Papaioannou,et al.  Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen–Loève expansion , 2014 .

[8]  Brian Y. Lattimer,et al.  Overview of aluminum alloy mechanical properties during and after fires , 2015 .

[9]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and probabilistic re-entry modeling for debris using high dimensional model representation based uncertainty treatment , 2017 .

[10]  Pietro Marco Congedo,et al.  CNES activities on polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty propagation , 2017 .

[11]  Nicholas L. Johnson,et al.  The Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT) ... , 2005 .

[12]  Rudy Pastel,et al.  Missile target accuracy estimation with importance splitting , 2013 .

[13]  Ilias Bilionis,et al.  Multi-output separable Gaussian process: Towards an efficient, fully Bayesian paradigm for uncertainty quantification , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Agathe Girard,et al.  Gaussian Processes: Prediction at a Noisy Input and Application to Iterative Multiple-Step Ahead Forecasting of Time-Series , 2003, European Summer School on Multi-AgentControl.

[15]  R. D. Klett DRAG COEFFICIENTS AND HEATING RATIOS FOR RIGHT CIRCULAR CYLINDERS IN FREE- MOLECULAR AND CONTINUUM FLOW FROM MACH 10 TO 30 , 1964 .

[16]  Célia Finzi,et al.  Simulation of the Ariane 5 EPC reentry with the Fragmentation tool suite , 2017 .

[17]  M. Spel,et al.  DEBRISK, a Tool for Re-Entry Risk Analysis , 2012 .

[18]  Xi Qu,et al.  Space Debris Reentry Analysis Methods and Tools , 2011 .

[19]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  P. Kärräng,et al.  Space debris atmospheric entry prediction with spacecraft-oriented tools , 2017 .

[21]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[22]  T. Lips,et al.  A comparison of commonly used re-entry analysis tools , 2005 .

[23]  Pierre Omaly,et al.  INFLUENCE OF OXIDATION AND EMISSIVITY FOR METALLIC ALLOYS SPACE DEBRIS DURING THEIR ATMOSPHERIC ENTRY , 2017 .

[24]  Pietro Marco Congedo,et al.  Efficient clustering based training set generation for systems of solvers , 2018 .

[25]  N. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of reentry survivability of UARS spacecraft , 2004 .

[26]  T. Lips,et al.  Scarab -a Multi-Disciplinary Code for Destruction Analysis of Space-Craft during Re-Entry , 2005 .

[27]  T. Oliphant A Bayesian perspective on estimating mean, variance, and standard-deviation from data , 2006 .

[28]  Jérôme Morio,et al.  Estimation of a launch vehicle stage fallout zone with parametric and non-parametric importance sampling algorithms in presence of uncertain input distributions , 2016 .

[29]  H. Hidalgo,et al.  Generalized Heat Transfer Formulas and Graphs for Nose Cone Re-Entry Into the Atmosphere , 1961 .

[30]  Fred W. Matting,et al.  Approximate Bridging Relations in the Transitional Regime between Continuum and Free-Molecule Flows , 1971 .

[31]  Jean-Marc Moschetta,et al.  Debris Aerodynamic Interaction and its Effect on Reentry Risk Assessment , 2013 .

[32]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Deep Gaussian Processes , 2012, AISTATS.

[33]  Ysolde Prévereaud,et al.  Contribution à la modélisation de la rentrée atmosphérique des débris spatiaux , 2014 .

[34]  M. V. Frank,et al.  A probabilistic paradigm for spacecraft random reentry disassembly , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  B. Lazare,et al.  ELECTRA © Launch and Re-Entry Safety Analysis Tool , 2010 .

[36]  J. Anderson,et al.  Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics , 2019 .

[37]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[38]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[39]  Pietro Marco Congedo,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation Framework for Systems of Solvers , 2018 .

[40]  D. Drob,et al.  Nrlmsise-00 Empirical Model of the Atmosphere: Statistical Comparisons and Scientific Issues , 2002 .

[41]  Mahmut Reyhanoglu,et al.  Estimation of debris dispersion due to a space vehicle breakup during reentry , 2013 .

[42]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[43]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[44]  D. Shahsavani,et al.  Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model outputs using surrogate models , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Comparison of non-intrusive approaches to uncertainty propagation in orbital mechanics , 2015 .

[46]  Charles Bertorello,et al.  ADRYANS® V5.0 – A 1-dimension object oriented survivability tool , 2017 .

[47]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[48]  T. Lips,et al.  Spacecraft destruction during re-entry – latest results and development of the SCARAB software system , 2002 .

[49]  Ali Gülhan,et al.  About the demisability of propellant tanks during atmospheric re-entry from LEO , 2017 .

[50]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  P. B. Coaker,et al.  Applied Dynamic Programming , 1964 .

[52]  B. Fritsche Uncertainty Quantification for Re-entry Survivability Prediction , 2015 .

[53]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .