The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia.

BACKGROUND There are several widely used sets of criteria for the diagnosis of dementia, but little is known about their degree of agreement and their effects on estimates of the prevalence of dementia. METHODS We examined 1879 men and women 65 years of age or older who were enrolled in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging and calculated the proportion given a diagnosis of dementia according to six commonly used classification systems: the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), third edition (DSM-III), the third edition, revised of the DSM (DSM-III-R), the fourth edition of the DSM (DSM-IV), the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th revision (ICD-9) and 10th revision (ICD-10), and the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX). The degree of concordance among classification schemes and the importance of various factors in determining diagnostic agreement or disagreement were examined. RESULTS The proportion of subjects with dementia varied from 3.1 percent when we used the criteria of the ICD-10 to 29.1 percent when the DSM-III criteria were used. The six classification systems identified different groups of subjects as having dementia; only 20 subjects were given a diagnosis of dementia according to all six systems. The classifications based on the various systems differed little according to the patients' age, sex, educational level, or status with respect to institutionalization. The factors that most often caused disagreement in diagnosis between DSM-III and ICD-10 were long-term memory, executive function, social activities, and duration of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The commonly used criteria for diagnosis can differ by a factor of 10 in the number of subjects classified as having dementia. Such disagreement has serious implications for research and treatment, as well as for the right of many older persons to drive, make a will, and handle financial affairs.

[1]  M. Kaste,et al.  Dementia three months after stroke. Baseline frequency and effect of different definitions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory Study (SAM) cohort. , 1997, Stroke.

[2]  M. Pericak-Vance,et al.  Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value of apolipoprotein-E genotyping for sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 1996, The Lancet.

[3]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Visualisation and quantification of rates of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, The Lancet.

[4]  H. Soininen,et al.  Apolipoprotein E, memory and Alzheimer's disease , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Truls Østbye,et al.  Neuropsychological test performance of specific diagnostic groups in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA). , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  E. Kristjansson,et al.  Neuropsychological detection of dementia: an overview of the neuropsychological component of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Dementia and Cognitive Impairment in the Oldest Old in the Community Prevalence and Comorbidity , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[8]  K. Bucholz,et al.  A comparison of DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 substance use disorders diagnoses in 1922 men and women subjects in the COGA study. Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. , 1994, Addiction.

[9]  Truls Østbye,et al.  Net economic costs of dementia in Canada. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  A. Mackinnon,et al.  A survey of dementia in the Canberra population: experience with ICD-10 and DSM-III-R criteria , 1994, Psychological Medicine.

[11]  K. Tomasson,et al.  Comparison of four diagnostic systems for the diagnosis of somatization disorder , 1993, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[12]  I. Skoog,et al.  A population-based study of dementia in 85-year-olds. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  H Merskey,et al.  Temporal lobe atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early Alzheimer's disease. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[14]  V. Hachinski.  Preventable senility: a call for action against the vascular dementias , 1992, The Lancet.

[15]  K. Holmen,et al.  Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in an elderly urban population , 1991, Neurology.

[16]  Anthony F. Jorm,et al.  The prevalence of dementia: A quantitative integration of the literature , 1987, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[17]  H. Chui,et al.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. , 1987, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[18]  F. Huppert,et al.  CAMDEX: A Standardised Instrument for the Diagnosis of Mental Disorder in the Elderly with Special Reference to the Early Detection of Dementia , 1986, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[20]  T. Wetterling,et al.  Comparison of different diagnostic criteria for vascular dementia (ADDTC, DSM-IV, ICD-10, NINDS-AIREN). , 1996, Stroke.

[21]  W. Mombour,et al.  Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders. , 1994, Psychopathology.

[22]  W. Hiller,et al.  Testing the comparability of psychiatric diagnoses in ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. , 1994, Psychopathology.

[23]  V. Hachinski,et al.  Rethinking Vascular Dementia (Part 1 of 2) , 1993 .