A General Framework to Testing the Effect of Transport Policy Measures to Achieve a Modal Shift: A Sequential Hybrid Model☆

Abstract In order to achieve to minimize car-based trips, transport planners have been particularly interested in understanding the factors that explain modal choices. In the transport modelling literature there has been an increasing awareness that socioeconomic attributes and quantitative variables are not sufficient to characterize travelers and forecast their travel behavior. Recent studies have also recognized that users’ social interactions and land use patterns influence travel behavior, especially when changes to transport systems are introduced, but links between international and Spanish perspectives are rarely deal. In this paper, factorial and path analyses through a Multiple-Indicator Multiple-Cause (MIMIC) model are used to understand and describe the relationship between the different psychological and environmental constructs with social influence and socioeconomic variables. The MIMIC model generates Latent Variables (LVs) to be incorporated sequentially into Discrete Choice Models (DCM) where the levels of service and cost attributes of travel modes are also included directly to measure the effect of the transport policies that have been introduced in Madrid during the last three years in the context of the economic crisis. The data used for this paper are collected from a two panel smartphone-based survey (n=255 and 190 same respondents, respectively) of Madrid.

[1]  Juan Carlos García-Palomares,et al.  Walking Accessibility to Public Transport: An Analysis Based on Microdata and GIS , 2013 .

[2]  João de Abreu e Silva,et al.  Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal , 2012 .

[3]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  Inclusion of latent variables in Mixed Logit models: Modelling and forecasting , 2010 .

[4]  Donggen Wang,et al.  Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on time use and travel behavior: a structural equations analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  INTEGRATION OF CHOICE AND LATENT VARIABLE MODELS. IN: IN PERPETUAL MOTION: TRAVEL BEHAVIOR RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AND APPLICATION CHALLENGES , 2002 .

[6]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models , 1999 .

[7]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Exploring the role of social capital influence variables on travel behaviour , 2014 .

[8]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Induced Travel Demand: Evidence From a Pseudo Panel Data Based Structural Equations Model , 2009 .

[10]  H. Mahmassani In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges , 2002 .

[11]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[12]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  On the Use of Mixed RP/SP Models in Prediction: Accounting for Systematic and Random Taste Heterogeneity , 2011, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Dianne M. Finkelstein,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2005, Technometrics.

[14]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[15]  Alejandro Tudela,et al.  Exploring the links between personal networks, time use, and the spatial distribution of social contacts , 2013 .

[16]  Konstadinos G. Goulias,et al.  Constraint-Based Assessment of Intra-household Bargaining on Time Allocation to Activities and Travel Using Individual Accessibility Measures , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research , 2001 .

[18]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Urban Built Environment Analysis: Evidence from a Mobility Survey in Madrid☆ , 2014 .

[19]  D. Bolduc,et al.  Sequential and Simultaneous Estimation of Hybrid Discrete Choice Models , 2010 .

[20]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[22]  María Francisca Yáñez,et al.  The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago , 2010 .

[23]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[24]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[25]  Julio Comendador Arquero,et al.  Urban built environment analysis: evidence from a mobility survey in Madrid , 2014 .

[26]  J. Carrasco,et al.  Exploring the Role of Psychological Factors in Mode Choice Models by a Latent Variables Approach , 2011 .