Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems for Strategy Making

The use of computers to support group work – as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) – on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS's have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the group as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition – data that is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeking to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a facilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for other parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the significant contrasts between the two approaches.

[1]  C. Eden,et al.  “Horses for courses”: A stakeholder approach to the evaluation of GDSSs , 1996 .

[2]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992 .

[3]  Colin Eden,et al.  Problem solving or problem finishing , 1987 .

[4]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[7]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Lessons from the Early Adopters of Web Groupware , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Issues in computer and non-computer supported GDSSs , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[10]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[11]  L. Floyd Lewis,et al.  Facilitator : a microcomputer decision support system for small groups , 1982 .

[12]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Scripts for group model building , 1997 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  IBM's Experiences with GroupSystems , 1990 .

[14]  L. Phillips.  People-centred group decision support , 1989 .

[15]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[16]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[18]  C. Eden,et al.  Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps , 1998 .

[19]  Colin Eden,et al.  Facilitating problem definition in teams , 1981 .

[20]  C. Eden.  A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) , 1992 .

[21]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Quality Assurance and Improvement: The Role of Strategy Making , 1992 .

[22]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[23]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Working with groups using groupware: electronic problem structuring and project management support for face to face and dispersed organisational groups , 1996 .

[24]  Colin Eden,et al.  Contrasting GDSSs and GSSs in the Context of Strategic Change Implications for Facilitation , 1997 .

[25]  Colin Eden,et al.  Strategic options development and analysis - SODA , 1989 .

[26]  A. Osborn.  Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[27]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[28]  Peter McHugh.  Defining the situation , 1968 .

[29]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[30]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  J.S. Valacich,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[33]  C. Eden,et al.  On the nature of problems in consulting practice , 1979 .

[34]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  OR Practice - The Army Manpower Long-Range Planning System , 1988, Oper. Res..

[35]  S. Floyd,et al.  Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation , 1992 .

[36]  F. Ackermann.  Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems , 1996 .

[37]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[38]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology : the theory and practice of combining management science methodologies , 1997 .

[39]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Strategy development and implementation - the role of a group decision support system , 1992 .

[40]  John B. Kidd.  Thinking in Organisations , 1980 .

[41]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Using the 'oval mapping process' to identify strategic issues and formulate effective strategies , 1995 .

[42]  Fran Ackermann.  Strategic direction through burning issues , 1992 .