Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming

The majority of the Earth’s terrestrial carbon is stored in the soil. If anthropogenic warming stimulates the loss of this carbon to the atmosphere, it could drive further planetary warming. Despite evidence that warming enhances carbon fluxes to and from the soil, the net global balance between these responses remains uncertain. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of warming-induced changes in soil carbon stocks by assembling data from 49 field experiments located across North America, Europe and Asia. We find that the effects of warming are contingent on the size of the initial soil carbon stock, with considerable losses occurring in high-latitude areas. By extrapolating this empirical relationship to the global scale, we provide estimates of soil carbon sensitivity to warming that may help to constrain Earth system model projections. Our empirical relationship suggests that global soil carbon stocks in the upper soil horizons will fall by 30 ± 30 petagrams of carbon to 203 ± 161 petagrams of carbon under one degree of warming, depending on the rate at which the effects of warming are realized. Under the conservative assumption that the response of soil carbon to warming occurs within a year, a business-as-usual climate scenario would drive the loss of 55 ± 50 petagrams of carbon from the upper soil horizons by 2050. This value is around 12–17 per cent of the expected anthropogenic emissions over this period. Despite the considerable uncertainty in our estimates, the direction of the global soil carbon response is consistent across all scenarios. This provides strong empirical support for the idea that rising temperatures will stimulate the net loss of soil carbon to the atmosphere, driving a positive land carbon–climate feedback that could accelerate climate change.

[1]  W. D. Billings CARBON BALANCE OF ALASKAN TUNDRA AND TAIGA ECOSYSTEMS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE , 1987 .

[2]  D. Jenkinson,et al.  Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming , 1991, Nature.

[3]  William A. Stock,et al.  Research Synthesis , 1996 .

[4]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION , 2000 .

[5]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[6]  R. Lark,et al.  Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003 , 2005, Nature.

[7]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[8]  F. Xiong,et al.  Warming increases aboveground plant biomass and C stocks in vascular‐plant‐dominated Antarctic tundra , 2008 .

[9]  A. Gelman Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level , 2010, Science.

[11]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward , 2011 .

[12]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[13]  R. Barry,et al.  Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: A research synthesis , 2011 .

[14]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[15]  Marc Macias-Fauria,et al.  Eurasian Arctic greening reveals teleconnections and the potential for structurally novel ecosystems , 2012 .

[16]  T. Crowther,et al.  Thermal acclimation in widespread heterotrophic soil microbes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[17]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Twenty-First-Century Compatible CO2 Emissions and Airborne Fraction Simulated by CMIP5 Earth System Models under Four Representative Concentration Pathways , 2013, Journal of Climate.

[18]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Climate Change Projections in CESM1(CAM5) Compared to CCSM4 , 2013 .

[19]  William R. Wieder,et al.  Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes , 2013 .

[20]  Hui Li,et al.  Responses of ecosystem carbon cycle to experimental warming: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Ecology.

[21]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage , 2013, Nature.

[22]  J. Randerson,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century , 2013 .

[23]  R. Houghton,et al.  Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty , 2014 .

[24]  G. Heuvelink,et al.  SoilGrids1km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  C. Bettigole,et al.  Mapping tree density at a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[26]  C. Koven,et al.  Toward improved model structures for analyzing priming: potential pitfalls of using bulk turnover time , 2015, Global change biology.

[27]  P. Ciais,et al.  A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon–climate feedback , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Petr Baldrian,et al.  Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  D. M. Lawrence,et al.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , 2014, Nature.

[30]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Controls on terrestrial carbon feedbacks by productivity versus turnover in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2015 .

[31]  G. Bonan,et al.  Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change , 2016 .

[32]  F. Q. Ribeiro The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.