Flow uniformity in a multi-intake pump sump model
暂无分享,去创建一个
The head-capacity curves for pumps developed by the pump manufacturer are based on tests of a single pump operation in a semi-infinite basin with no close walls or floors and with no stray currents. Therefore, flow into the pump intake is with no vortices or swirling. However, pump station designers relying on these curves to define the operating conditions for the pump selected sometimes experience reductions of capacity and efficiency, as well as the increase of vibration and additional noise, which are caused by free air mixed with the pump inlet flow. Therefore, sump model test is necessary in order to examine the flow structure around pump intake. In this study, flow uniformity according to the flow distribution in the pump intake channel is examined to find out the cause of vortex occurrence in detail. A multi-intake pump sump model with 7 pump intakes and a single-intake pump sump model are adopted for the investigation. Furthermore, effectiveness of anti-submerged vortex device (AVD) for the suppression of the vortex occurrence in a single pump intake, as well as in a multi-intake pump sump model has been examined by the methods of experiment and numerical analysis. The results show that most high value of flow uniformity is found at the inlet of pump intakes #3 and 5 in the multi-intake pump sump with 7 pump intakes. Therefore, when the pump station is designed, the flow patterns at the upstream region of pump intake inlet in the forebay diffusing area should be to consider in detail because the unbalanced flow at the channel inlet region gives considerable influence on the vortex occurrence around bell-mouth. Strong submerged vortex can be successfully suppressed by AVD installation on the bottom of pump intake channel just below the bell mouth.
[1] George E. Hecker,et al. Scale Effects in Pump Sump Models , 1984 .
[2] Tomoyoshi Okamura,et al. MEASUREMENT OF THE FLOW AROUND THE SUBMERGED VORTEX CAVITATION IN A PUMP INTAKE BY MEANS OF PIV , 2003 .
[3] R. P. Benedict,et al. ASME Measurement Uncertainty , 1985 .