The generalized multidelay adaptive filter: structure and convergence analysis

Frequency-domain adaptive filters have long been recognized as an attractive alternative to time-domain algorithms when dealing with systems with large impulse response and/or correlated input. New frequency-domain LMS adaptive schemes have been proposed. These algorithms essentially retain the attractive features of frequency-domain implementations, while requiring a processing delay considerably smaller than the length of the impulse response. The authors show that these algorithms can be seen as particular implementations of a more general scheme, the generalized multidelay filter (GMDF). Within this general class of algorithms, we focus on implementations based on the weighted overlap and add reconstruction algorithms; these variants, overlooked in previous contributions, provide an independent control of the overall processing delay and of the rate of update of the filter coefficients, allowing a trade-off between the computational complexity and the rate of convergence. We present a comprehensive analysis of the performance of this new scheme and to provide insight into the influence of impulse response segmentation on the behavior of the adaptive algorithm. Exact analytical expressions for the steady-state mean-square error are first derived. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of the algorithm to the optimal solution within finite variance are then obtained, and are translated into bounds for the stepsize parameter. Simulations are presented to support our analysis and to demonstrate the practical usefulness of the GMDF algorithm in applications where large impulse response has to be processed. >

[1]  A. Peterson,et al.  Transform domain LMS algorithm , 1983 .

[2]  Jae Chon Lee,et al.  Performance of transform-domain LMS adaptive digital filters , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  Pierre Duhamel,et al.  Implementation of "Split-radix" FFT algorithms for complex, real, and real-symmetric data , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive filtering in the frequency domain , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  E. Ferrara Fast implementations of LMS adaptive filters , 1980 .

[6]  A. Janssen,et al.  Convergence analysis of a frequency-domain adaptive filter with exponential power averaging and generalized window function , 1987 .

[7]  A. Gray,et al.  Unconstrained frequency-domain adaptive filter , 1982 .

[8]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  On the asymptotic eigenvalue distribution of Toeplitz matrices , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  J.-S. Soo,et al.  Multidelay block frequency domain adaptive filter , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[10]  M. T. Wasan Stochastic Approximation , 1969 .

[11]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Block implementation of adaptive digital filters , 1981 .

[12]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Block adaptive filtering , 1980 .

[13]  J. Shynk Frequency-domain and multirate adaptive filtering , 1992, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Chong Kwan Un,et al.  Performance analysis of frequency-domain block LMS adaptive digital filters , 1989 .

[15]  Arie Feuer Performance analysis of the block least mean square algorithm , 1985 .

[16]  Mischa Schwartz,et al.  Automatic equalization using the discrete frequency domain , 1973, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Neil J. Bershad,et al.  A normalized frequency domain LMS adaptive algorithm , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[18]  Hong Fan,et al.  GAL and LSL Revisited: New Convergence Results , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Bernard Delyon,et al.  Asymptotical Study of Parameter Tracking Algorithms , 1995 .