The implementation of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) in the United States is an ongoing challenge for policymakers due to the complexity of the air transportation system (ATS) with its broad array of stakeholders and dynamic interdependencies between them. The successful implementation of NextGen has a hard dependency on the active participation of U.S. commercial airlines. To assist policymakers in identifying potential policy designs that facilitate the implementation of NextGen, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and LMI developed a research framework called the Air Transportation System Evolutionary Simulation (ATS-EVOS). This framework integrates large empirical data sets with multiple specialized models to simulate the evolution of the airline response to potential future policies and explore consequential impacts on ATS performance and market dynamics. In the ATS-EVOS configuration presented here, we leverage the Transportation Systems Analysis Model (TSAM), the Airline Evolutionary Simulation (AIRLINE-EVOS), the Airspace Concept Evaluation System (ACES), and the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT), all of which enable this research to comprehensively represent the complex facets of the ATS and its participants. We validated this baseline configuration of ATS-EVOS against Airline Origin and Destination Survey (DB1B) data and subject matter expert opinion, and we verified the ATS-EVOS framework and agent behavior logic through scenario-based experiments that explored potential implementations of a carbon tax, congestion pricing policy, and the dynamics for equipage of new technology by airlines. These experiments demonstrated ATS-EVOS's capabilities in responding to a wide range of potential NextGen-related policies and utility for decision makers to gain insights for effective policy design.
[1]
E. C. Russell,et al.
Winter Simulation Conference
,
2019,
Volume 39, Number 5, October 2012.
[2]
Shahab Hasan,et al.
Agent Based Modeling of Air Carrier Behavior for Evaluation of Technology Equipage and Adoption
,
2014
.
[3]
Robert Lempert,et al.
Agent-based modeling as organizational and public policy simulators
,
2002,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4]
A. S. Getchell,et al.
Agent-based Modeling
,
2008
.
[5]
Ian Savage,et al.
Departure Delays, the Pricing of Congestion, and Expansion Proposals at Chicago O’Hare Airport
,
2006
.
[6]
Birgit Müller,et al.
A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models
,
2006
.
[7]
Vikram Manikonda,et al.
FAST -TIME SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORTATION CONCEPTS
,
2002
.
[9]
Matthew Blake,et al.
Fast-Time NAS Simulation System for Analysis of Advanced ATM Concepts
,
2002
.
[10]
J. Gareth Polhill,et al.
The ODD protocol: A review and first update
,
2010,
Ecological Modelling.