First-line cetuximab-based chemotherapies for patients with advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly occurring cancers worldwide. A burgeoning number of studies have demonstrated that the addition of cetuximab to another standard first-line regimen markedly improves the outcome of CRC treatment. However, at present, the efficacy and safety of cetuximab-based combination chemotherapy has not been well described in Japan. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapies that included cetuximab for patients with advanced or metastatic Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild-type CRC in Japan. This prospective multicenter observational study was conducted at 13 affiliated medical institutions. A total of 64 patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2013. The patients met the following criteria for eligibility: i) histologically confirmed, advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type CRC; and ii) cetuximab-based chemotherapies administered as a first-line treatment. First-line cetuximab-based treatments were administered as follows: 29 patients (45.3%) received a combination of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin; 14 patients (21.9%) received a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin; and 10 patients (15.6%) received a combination of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan. The overall response rate (including complete plus partial responses) was 50% (32/64 patients). Initially, 48 lesions were diagnosed as unresectable. Among those, 13 lesions (27.1%) were converted to a resectable status following cetuximab-based combination chemotherapy treatments. The median overall survival time and the progression-free survival time were 1,189 and 359 days, respectively. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 20.3% of the patients. The incidence of grade 3/4 skin toxicity was 17.2% (11/64 patients). Cetuximab-based therapies may represent a promising first-line regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type CRC in Japan. In addition, this combination was associated with a low incidence of serious toxicities.

[1]  A Messori,et al.  Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Weitz,et al.  Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  International Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  E. Tokunaga,et al.  Impact of second-line and later cetuximab-containing therapy and KRAS genotypes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter study in Japan , 2013, Surgery Today.

[8]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[9]  Hartmut Link,et al.  FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Christian Jacques,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Schilsky,et al.  First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  D. Sargent,et al.  Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Z. Hua Cetuximab Monotherapy and Cetuximab plus Irinotecan in Irinotecan-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006 .

[14]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  R. Labianca,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[17]  R. James,et al.  Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[18]  Ma Dong,et al.  Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan,Fluorouracil,and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006 .

[19]  M. Nagino,et al.  Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review , 2016, Surgery Today.

[20]  L. Saltz,et al.  Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  R. Pearson,et al.  Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2010 .