Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Quality of Life for Patients With Low Back Pain

Study Design. Multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Objective. To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries of Short Form SF-12 (SF-12), in patients with low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. Quality of life is one of the core domains recommended to be assessed in patients with LBP. SF-12 is the most widely used instrument for this purpose, but its MCID was unknown. Methods. A total of 458 patients with subacute and chronic LBP were consecutively recruited across 21 practices. LBP, referred pain, disability, PCS, and MCS were assessed upon recruitment and 12 months later. Self-reported health status change between baseline and 12 month-assessment, was used as the external criterion. The MCID for SF-12 was estimated following four anchor-based methods; minimal detectable change (MDC); average change (AC); change difference (CD); and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), for which the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The effect on MCID values of pain duration and baseline scores was assessed. Results. Values for PCS were: MDC: 0.56, AC: 2.71, CD: 3.29, and ROC: 1.14. Values for MCS were: MDC: 3.77, AC: 3.54, CD: 1.13, and ROC: 4.23. AUC values were <0.7; MCID values were smaller among chronic patients and those with better baseline quality of life. Conclusion. Different methods for MCID calculation lead to different results. In patients with subacute and chronic LBP, improvements >3.77 in MCS and >3.29 in PCS, can be considered clinically relevant. MCID is smaller in patients with longer pain duration and better baseline quality of life. Level of Evidence: 2

[1]  K. Lin,et al.  Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain. , 2017, American family physician.

[2]  Joseph S. Cheng,et al.  Surgical Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: Patient Reported Outcomes and Minimum Clinically Important Difference , 2016, Spine.

[3]  Zhongjun Liu,et al.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in neurological function and quality of life after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a prospective cohort study , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[4]  C. Terwee,et al.  Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[5]  P. Côté,et al.  Is neck pain associated with worse health-related quality of life 6 months later? A population-based cohort study. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  P. Côté,et al.  Is low back pain associated with worse health-related quality of life 6 months later? , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[7]  F. Kovacs,et al.  Effectiveness of the Godelieve Denys-Struyf (GDS) Method in People With Low Back Pain: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[8]  A. Keys,et al.  Indices of relative weight and obesity. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  C. Seale,et al.  A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[10]  G. Pransky,et al.  Twenty-Five Years With the Biopsychosocial Model of Low Back Pain—Is It Time to Celebrate? A Report From the Twelfth International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain , 2013, Spine.

[11]  M. McGirt,et al.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  A. Copay.  Commentary: the proliferation of minimum clinically important differences. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  R. Chou,et al.  What Does/Should the Minimum Clinically Important Difference Measure?: A Reconsideration of Its Clinical Value in Evaluating Efficacy of Lumbar Fusion Surgery , 2012, The Clinical journal of pain.

[14]  M. McGirt,et al.  Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[15]  Joseph S. Cheng,et al.  Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[16]  G. Úrrutia,et al.  Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2011, Spine.

[17]  M. Plana,et al.  Catastrophizing, state anxiety, anger, and depressive symptoms do not correlate with disability when variations of trait anxiety are taken into account. a study of chronic low back pain patients treated in Spanish pain units [NCT00360802]. , 2011, Pain medicine.

[18]  M. King.  A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods , 2011, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[19]  A. Muriel,et al.  The Correlation Between Pain, Catastrophizing, and Disability in Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Study in the Routine Clinical Practice of the Spanish National Health Service , 2011, Spine.

[20]  B. Koes,et al.  Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[21]  E. Carragee.  The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference". , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[22]  E. Carragee,et al.  Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  T. Mayer,et al.  Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[24]  S. Berven,et al.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[25]  Gemma Vilagut,et al.  Interpretación de los cuestionarios de salud SF-36 y SF-12 en España: componentes físico y mental , 2008 .

[26]  R. Hays,et al.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  J. Zamora,et al.  Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity and Disability in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain , 2007, Spine.

[28]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  A. Copay,et al.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[30]  Henrica C W de Vet,et al.  Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Health Status in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain , 2006, Spine.

[31]  H. Ursin,et al.  Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[32]  J. Zamora,et al.  The Transition from Acute to Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Study Based on Determinants of Quality of Life and Prediction of Chronic Disability , 2005, Spine.

[33]  N. Polissar,et al.  Time-Dependent Surgical Outcomes Following Cauda Equina Syndrome Diagnosis: Comments on a Meta-Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[34]  I. Stiell,et al.  Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[35]  M. S. Cepeda,et al.  What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? , 2003, Pain.

[36]  Ross D Crosby,et al.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  F. Kovacs,et al.  Validation of the Spanish Version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire , 2002, Spine.

[38]  D. Beaton,et al.  Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[39]  J. Farrar,et al.  Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale , 2001, PAIN.

[40]  B Shea,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[41]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[42]  Gordon Waddell,et al.  The Back Pain Revolution , 1998 .

[43]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[44]  J. Ware,et al.  Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  R A Deyo,et al.  Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: A Proposal for Standardized Use , 1998, Spine.

[46]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[47]  A. M. Harvey.  Classification of Chronic Pain—Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms , 1995 .

[48]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[49]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[50]  W. Downie,et al.  Studies with pain rating scales. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[51]  S. Glassman,et al.  Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[52]  Joseph S. Cheng,et al.  Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[53]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  L. Manderson,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2006 .

[55]  R A Deyo,et al.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.