Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Background and aimsThe laparoscopic approach is common for several surgical procedures. Although the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery is described as being beneficial, its use is not yet widespread. This restriction may be due to technical difficulties. The use of telerobotic assistance may simplify complex laparoscopic procedures. We compared the traditional laparoscopic and the telerobotic-assisted approaches to colorectal surgery.Patients and methodsBetween August 2002 and January 2004, 61 laparoscopic colorectal operations were performed. In this study we focused on sigmoid resection for benign disease. Twenty-three patients underwent sigmoid resection for diverticulitis using traditional laparoscopy, and 4 using telerobotic-assisted laparoscopy. The DaVinci system was used for telerobotic assistance. Four patients underwent resection rectopexies, 2 with traditional and 2 with telerobotic-assisted laparoscopy.ResultsThe DaVinci device worked well during all operations. No robot-related complications occurred. The conversion rate was 3 out of 23 with traditional laparoscopy and 1 out of 4 in the telerobotic-assisted group. The incidence of postoperative complications was 5 out of 23 after traditional laparoscopic and 1 out of 4 following telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic resection. Operation time was significantly longer using the telerobotic-assisted approach (236.7±5.8 vs. 172.4±38 min, p<0.05).ConclusionColorectal surgery using the DaVinci system is safe and feasible. Compared to traditional laparoscopy, we did not see any relevant practical advantages of the supportive features of the telerobotic assistance that simplified the operation significantly. However, it would be useful to evaluate the telerobotic-assisted approach for other kinds of laparoscopic procedures.

[1]  G. Ballantyne.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[2]  G. Ballantyne,et al.  Telerobotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Right and Sigmoid Colectomies for Benign Disease , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  V. Fazio,et al.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  W. Schwenk,et al.  Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  Marco Braga,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Trial on Short-Term Outcome , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Santiago Horgan,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy , 2003, The American surgeon.

[7]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[8]  B. Gayet,et al.  Major digestive surgery using a remote-controlled robot: the next revolution. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[9]  I A M J Broeders,et al.  Robotics in Laparoscopic Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives , 2002, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement.

[10]  D. Lauter,et al.  Initial experience with 150 cases of laparoscopic assisted colectomy. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[11]  S. Horgan,et al.  A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  G. Caravaglios,et al.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[13]  A. Lacy,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted resection of a gastric lipoma , 1995, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  J. Himpens,et al.  Feasibility of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery: 146 Cases , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  I. B. Borel Rinkes,et al.  Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: An Evaluation of 35 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[16]  O. Schwandner,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  J. Monson,et al.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  E. Campo,et al.  Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer , 1995, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  D. Lauter,et al.  Surgeon experience with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery in Washington State. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[20]  J. Fann,et al.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  R. K. Wolf,et al.  Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[22]  G. Ballantyne.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[23]  A. Senagore,et al.  Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery , 2003, Annals of surgery.