Construction and application of an efficient dual-base editing platform for Bacillus subtilis evolution employing programmable base conversion

The functionally evolved bacterial chassis is of great importance to manufacture a group of assorted high value-added chemicals, from small molecules to biologically active macromolecules. However, the current evolution frameworks are less efficienct in generating in vivo genomic diversification because of insufficient tunability, rendering limited evolution spacing for chassis. Here, an engineered genomic diversification platform (CRISPR-ABE8e-CDA-nCas9) leveraging a programmable dual-deaminases base editor was fabricated for rapidly evolving bacterial chassis. The dual-base editor was constructed by reprogramming the CRISPR array, nCas9, and cytidine and adenosine deaminase, enabling single or multiple base conversion at the genomic scale by simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G conversion in vivo. Employing titration of the Cas-deaminase fusion protein, the platform enabled editing any pre-defined genomic loci with tunable conversion efficiency and editable window, generating a repertoire of mutants with highly diversified genomic sequences. Leveraging the genomic diversification platform, we successfully evolved the nisin-resistant capability of Bacillus subtilis through directed evolution of the subunit of lantibiotic ATP-binding cassette. Therefore, our work provides a portable and programmable genomic diversification platform, which is promising to expedite the fabrication of high-performance and robust bacterial chassis used in the development of biomanufacturing and biopharmaceuticals.

[1]  J. R. van der Meer,et al.  Subcellular Localization Defects Characterize Ribose-Binding Mutant Proteins with New Ligand Properties in Escherichia coli , 2021, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Li Zhou,et al.  Development of a base editor for protein evolution via in situ mutation in vivo , 2021, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Yajie Wang,et al.  Directed Evolution: Methodologies and Applications. , 2021, Chemical reviews.

[4]  R. Breitling,et al.  The evolving art of creating genetic diversity: From directed evolution to synthetic biology , 2021, Biotechnology advances.

[5]  C. Smolke,et al.  Polymerase-guided base editing enables in vivo mutagenesis and rapid protein engineering , 2021, Nature Communications.

[6]  V. de Lorenzo,et al.  In vivo diversification of target genomic sites using processive base deaminase fusions blocked by dCas9 , 2020, Nature Communications.

[7]  S. Rosser,et al.  CRISPR-dCas9 mediated cytosine deaminase base editing in Bacillus subtilis. , 2020, ACS synthetic biology.

[8]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Base editors for simultaneous introduction of C-to-T and A-to-G mutations , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Mingyao Liu,et al.  Dual base editor catalyzes both cytosine and adenine base conversions in human cells , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  A dual-deaminase CRISPR base editor enables concurrent adenine and cytosine editing , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  David R. Liu,et al.  Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Y. Zong,et al.  Targeted, random mutagenesis of plant genes with dual cytosine and adenine base editors , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  S. Lee,et al.  Highly efficient DSB-free base editing for streptomycetes with CRISPR-BEST , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Li Xu,et al.  BEAT: A Python Program to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing. , 2019, The CRISPR journal.

[15]  Kornel Labun,et al.  CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Shihui Yang,et al.  CRISPR-assisted multi-dimensional regulation for fine-tuning gene expression in Bacillus subtilis , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Arjun Ravikumar,et al.  Scalable, Continuous Evolution of Genes at Mutation Rates above Genomic Error Thresholds , 2018, Cell.

[18]  Chao Li,et al.  Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  John E. Dueber,et al.  CRISPR-guided DNA polymerases enable diversification of all nucleotides in a tunable window , 2018, Nature.

[20]  Matthew D Shoulders,et al.  A Processive Protein Chimera Introduces Mutations across Defined DNA Regions In Vivo. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  John R. Garbe,et al.  EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing , 2018, The CRISPR journal.

[22]  C. Li,et al.  Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion , 2018, Genome Biology.

[23]  Yu Wang,et al.  MACBETH: Multiplex automated Corynebacterium glutamicum base editing method. , 2018, Metabolic engineering.

[24]  A. Kondo,et al.  Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli , 2018, Nature Microbiology.

[25]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[26]  Gaelen T. Hess,et al.  Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells , 2016, Nature Methods.

[27]  Yan Song,et al.  Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells , 2016, Nature Methods.

[28]  A. Kondo,et al.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems , 2016, Science.

[29]  J. Altenbuchner.  Editing of the Bacillus subtilis Genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  István Nagy,et al.  A highly precise and portable genome engineering method allows comparison of mutational effects across bacterial species , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  David R. Liu,et al.  Methods for the directed evolution of proteins , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  Andrew Currin,et al.  Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[33]  Thorsten Mascher,et al.  Peptide Antibiotic Sensing and Detoxification Modules of Bacillus subtilis , 2010, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[34]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[35]  T. Peterson,et al.  Membrane protein expression: no cells required. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[36]  Xin Yan,et al.  Cre/lox System and PCR-Based Genome Engineering in Bacillus subtilis , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  Thorsten Mascher,et al.  Bacitracin sensing in Bacillus subtilis , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[38]  J. Keasling.  Synthetic biology for synthetic chemistry. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[39]  Christophe Ampe,et al.  Reducing mutational bias in random protein libraries. , 2005, Analytical biochemistry.

[40]  G. Fichant,et al.  Inventory, assembly and analysis of Bacillus subtilis ABC transport systems. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  K. Gupta,et al.  A highly efficient procedure for site-specific mutagenesis of full-length plasmids using Vent DNA polymerase. , 1995, Genome research.

[42]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Single-step assembly of a gene and entire plasmid from large numbers of oligodeoxyribonucleotides. , 1995, Gene.

[43]  W. Stemmer.  DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  R. Sauer,et al.  Combinatorial cassette mutagenesis as a probe of the informational content of protein sequences. , 1988, Science.

[45]  H. Heyneker,et al.  Targeted random mutagenesis: the use of ambiguously synthesized oligonucleotides to mutagenize sequences immediately 5' of an ATG initiation codon. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[47]  Ryota Fujii,et al.  Error-prone rolling circle amplification: the simplest random mutagenesis protocol , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[48]  Ryota Fujii,et al.  One-step random mutagenesis by error-prone rolling circle amplification. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.