Virtual Teams in the Context of Virtual Daily Life: A Communication Perspective

Perceived as the form of organizing of the future, virtual teams have proliferated all over the world. However, the meaning of virtualization is more than just a work arrangement. People actually enjoy the benefits of remote communication via ICT in daily life. Given the communication difficulties in virtual teams, this paper reviews the literature of virtual teams and the literature of virtual daily life from a communication perspective using a framework that includes media, people and context issues. The findings demonstrate that remote communications in both settings are similar in two of the three key elements of communication – media and people and demonstrate both differences and similarities in the third dimension context. Drawing on these findings, this paper makes a contribution to theory and research by exploring the potential influences of taking virtual daily life into account on the understanding of virtual team communication. Based on the application of channel expansion theory, self-efficacy theory and concerns about cultural effects, this paper reveals that experiencing virtual daily life may have a positive influence on the effectiveness of communication in virtual teams. Future research directions are suggested to continue the investigation of these relationships.

[1]  Yvonne Dittrich,et al.  Software engineering across boundaries: student project in distributed collaboration , 1999 .

[2]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[3]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[4]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Has the Internet become indispensable? , 2004, CACM.

[5]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[7]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[8]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[9]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[12]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Thomas C. Anderson.  The body and communities in cyberspace: A Mmarcellian analysis , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Ned Kock,et al.  Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective , 2004 .

[15]  S. Sackmann.  Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge , 1992 .

[16]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet : intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications , 1998 .

[17]  N. Gonchar,et al.  Living in Cyberspace , 2000 .

[18]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[19]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The driving forces in the virtual society , 1999, CACM.

[20]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[21]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda , 2003 .

[22]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[23]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[24]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[26]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[27]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[28]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  A Taxonomy of Internet Communication Tools , 1997, WebNet.

[29]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[30]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Meeting Current Challenges for Virtually Collocated Teams: Participation, Culture and Integration , 2001 .

[31]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[32]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[33]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[34]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play and Life via Technology , 2000 .