Active training paradigm for motor imagery BCI

Brain–computer interface (BCI) allows the use of brain activities for people to directly communicate with the external world or to control external devices without participation of any peripheral nerves and muscles. Motor imagery is one of the most popular modes in the research field of brain–computer interface. Although motor imagery BCI has some advantages compared with other modes of BCI, such as asynchronization, it is necessary to require training sessions before using it. The performance of trained BCI system depends on the quality of training samples or the subject engagement. In order to improve training effect and decrease training time, we proposed a new paradigm where subjects participated in training more actively than in the traditional paradigm. In the traditional paradigm, a cue (to indicate what kind of motor imagery should be imagined during the current trial) is given to the subject at the beginning of a trial or during a trial, and this cue is also used as a label for this trial. It is usually assumed that labels for trials are accurate in the traditional paradigm, although subjects may not have performed the required or correct kind of motor imagery, and trials may thus be mislabeled. And then those mislabeled trials give rise to interference during model training. In our proposed paradigm, the subject is required to reconfirm the label and can correct the label when necessary. This active training paradigm may generate better training samples with fewer inconsistent labels because it overcomes mistakes when subject’s motor imagination does not match the given cues. The experiments confirm that our proposed paradigm achieves better performance; the improvement is significant according to statistical analysis.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Z.J. Koles,et al.  Principal-component localization of the sources of the background EEG , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  M. Diamond,et al.  Primary Motor and Sensory Cortex Activation during Motor Performance and Motor Imagery: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  Vladimir Cherkassky,et al.  The Nature Of Statistical Learning Theory , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Marti A. Hearst Intelligent Connections: Battling with GA-Joe. , 1998 .

[8]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  S. Page,et al.  A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  S. Page,et al.  Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[16]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Home-based motor imagery training for gait rehabilitation of people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Liqing Zhang,et al.  EEG-based asynchronous BCI control of a car in 3D virtual reality environments , 2009 .

[19]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Turning Shortcomings into Challenges: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Games , 2009, INTETAIN.

[20]  Bin He,et al.  Goal selection versus process control in a brain–computer interface based on sensorimotor rhythms , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Liqing Zhang,et al.  Bilateral adaptation and neurofeedback for brain computer interface system , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Bin He,et al.  EEG Control of a Virtual Helicopter in 3-Dimensional Space Using Intelligent Control Strategies , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Marie Johnston,et al.  Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.