STRATEGIC CAPABILITIES FOR THE GROWTH OF MANUFACTURING SMEs: A CONFIGURATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

In a now global knowledge-based economy, the strategic intent of manufacturing SMEs is manifested by the development of strategic capabilities not only for product and market development, but also for the development of their network, technological and human resources. This paper presents the results of a survey study of the strategic capabilities of 292 manufacturing firms, that is, 213 Canadian and 79 French SMEs. Taking the firms' entrepreneurial and organizational context into account, three distinct configurations of strategic capabilities are identified, namely 57 entrepreneurial SMEs, 93 engineering SMEs and 142 administrative SMEs, the first configuration being the "ideal" one in terms of growth.

[1]  M. Mathews,et al.  An Interview with , 2009 .

[2]  Stephen C. Jones,et al.  The Effect Of Strategic Orientation And Gender On Survival: A Study Of Potential Mass Merchandising Suppliers , 2008 .

[3]  Boris Kabanoff,et al.  Knowledge Structures of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders: Content, Structure, Stability, and Performance , 2008 .

[4]  John G. Watson,et al.  Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance , 2007 .

[5]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[6]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Small business growth: recent evidence and new directions , 2007 .

[7]  Ana M. Moreno,et al.  High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discriminant analysis , 2007 .

[8]  James W. Ice.  Strategic Intent: A Key to Business Strategy Development and Culture Change , 2007 .

[9]  L. Raymond,et al.  La grh, levier du développement stratégique des PME , 2007 .

[10]  G. Tyge Payne.  Examining Configurations and Firm Performance in a Suboptimal Equifinality Context , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[11]  S. Thornhill.  Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes , 2006 .

[12]  Victoria L. Mitchell,et al.  Endogenous Adaptation: The Effects of Technology Position and Planning Mode on IT-Enabled Change , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[13]  James A. Wolff,et al.  Small‐Firm Performance: Modeling the Role of Product and Process Improvements , 2006 .

[14]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Operations management and advanced manufacturing technologies in SMEs , 2005 .

[15]  J. Wincent,et al.  Personal traits of CEOs, inter-firm networking and entrepreneurship in their firms : investigating strategic SME network participants , 2005 .

[16]  Philip Powell,et al.  Strategic Intent and E-Business in SMEs: Enablers and Inhibitors , 2005, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[17]  Bruce R. Barringer,et al.  A Quantitative Content Analysis of the Characteristics of Rapid-Growth Firms and Their Founders , 2005 .

[18]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[19]  G. Sánchez-Marín,et al.  Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs , 2005 .

[20]  F. Barry.  FDI, transfer pricing and the measurement of R&D intensity , 2005 .

[21]  Kaisu Puumalainen,et al.  International Growth Orientation of Knowledge-Intensive SMES , 2005 .

[22]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[23]  Takehiko Yasuda.  Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing , 2005 .

[24]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach , 2005 .

[25]  Bernice Kotey,et al.  Changing HRM practices with firm growth , 2004 .

[26]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[27]  E. A. Locke,et al.  The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Christos Kalantaridis,et al.  Internationalization, Strategic Behavior, and the Small Firm: A Comparative Investigation , 2004 .

[29]  G. J. Hoogstra,et al.  Explaining Firm Employment Growth: Does Location Matter? , 2004 .

[30]  Stuart Locke,et al.  ICT Adoption and SME Growth in New Zealand , 2004 .

[31]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Aspiring for, and Achieving Growth: The Moderating Role of Resources and Opportunities , 2003 .

[32]  D. Ketchen.  An interview with Raymond E. Miles and Charles C. Snow , 2003 .

[33]  D. Hambrick.  On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors , 2003 .

[34]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Miles and Snow: Enduring insights for managers , 2003 .

[35]  Hannu Littunen,et al.  The High Growth in New Metal-Based Manufacturing and Business Service Firms in Finland , 2003 .

[36]  Y. Chang,et al.  Benefits of co‐operation on innovative performance: evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan , 2003 .

[37]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[38]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[39]  P. Davidsson,et al.  What Do They Think and Feel about Growth? An Expectancy–Value Approach to Small Business Managers’ Attitudes toward Growth 1 , 2003 .

[40]  P. Davidsson,et al.  What Do They Think and Feel about Growth? An Expectancy-Value Approach to Small Business Managers‘ Attitudes toward Growth1 , 2003 .

[41]  Keld Laursen,et al.  New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance , 2003 .

[42]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation , 2003 .

[43]  William A. Ward,et al.  How Small Is Too Small? Firm Size as a Barrier to Exporting from the United States* , 2003 .

[44]  Martti Lindman,et al.  Open or closed strategy in developing new products? A case study of industrial NPD in SMEs , 2002 .

[45]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants , 2002 .

[46]  K. Walsh,et al.  Small Firm Networks: A Successful Approach to Innovation? , 2002 .

[47]  L. Kish.  Combining multipopulation statistics , 2002 .

[48]  S. Snell,et al.  Human resources and the resource based view of the firm , 2001 .

[49]  P. Julien,et al.  Dynamic regions and high‐growth SMEs: uncertainty, potential information and weak signal networks , 2001 .

[50]  M. Freel,et al.  Strategy and Structure in Innovative Manufacturing SMEs: The Case of an English Region , 2000 .

[51]  P. Swamidass,et al.  Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[52]  Peter J. Dowling,et al.  Completing the Puzzle: Issues in the Development of the Field of International Human Resource Management , 1999 .

[53]  Arun Rai,et al.  Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation* , 1999 .

[54]  Danny Miller,et al.  Notes on the Study of Configurations , 1999 .

[55]  Benoit Montreuil,et al.  Networked manufacturing:: The impact of information sharing , 1999 .

[56]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[57]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, U.K. and Irish Companies , 1997 .

[58]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[59]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[60]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[61]  T. Huang,et al.  The effect of participative management on organizational performance: the case of Taiwan , 1997 .

[62]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[63]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[64]  Nigel F. Piercy,et al.  The network paradigm and the marketing organization , 1995 .

[65]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Organizational Configurations and Performance: A Comparison of Theoretical Approaches , 1993 .

[66]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[67]  H. Howard,et al.  Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship || A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management , 1990 .

[68]  H. Stevenson,et al.  A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management * , 1990 .

[69]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[70]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[71]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[72]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[73]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[74]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[75]  B. Hako.  Strategies for diversification , 1972 .

[76]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .