Value of reduced transport time variability in freight transport

This paper covers a recent study on the valuation of transport time saving (TTS) and transport time variability (TTV) in Norway. The authors have focused on the benefits of faster and more reliable transport to shippers and carriers. In principle, the economic benefits of TTS and reduced TTV for carriers are related to the reductions of direct costs, e.g., vehicles and drivers, while for shippers the costs are related to the cargo and the payment to transport firms for carrying the cargo. Hence, the study covers both transport firms and shippers which provide transport services (hired transport). In addition, a separate survey was carried out among those shippers that transport their goods themselves (own account freight). The firms were recruited from two e-mail databases (9826 firms, most of them in the shippers segment). Approximately 5.6 percent of the shippers and 9.1 percent of the transport firms completed the whole questionnaire, which is a similar response rate to other surveys among firms. The study was not limited to specific types of firms within shippers and carrier segments. All firms were invited to participate, regardless of firm size, type of goods or choice of transport mode, etc. This implies a very heterogeneous final sample. The main reason was to gain an overview in a field in which there has been done little research before. The survey was carried out using a questionnaire which includes three choice experiments (CEs). In the first experiment, transport alternatives differ with respect to transport time and cost, In the second and the third experiments firms choose between alternatives where transport costs, the transport time variation or the risk of delay or risk of too early delivery vary. The choice experiments were designed using a reported actual shipment as the reference. In addition to questions about the reported actual shipment or transport, firms were also asked questions about their interpretation of TTV and its significance for them and the causes and consequences of early deliveries or delays. Using the results from the first and the second CE, the authors can compare the valuation of transport time in a stochastic and non-stochastic context. The results indicate that mean transport time, which is the mean of the distribution presented in the second CE, is valued higher in monetary terms than transport time is in the first CE. The authors also investigate the degree of consistency between the valuation of variability from the second CE and the valuation of delay in the third CE. The questionnaire used in the survey includes a number of questions about firm characteristics and characteristics of the shipment or transport used as a reference. Hence the authors are able to address the influence of these observable characteristics on the values of time and reliability. The authors also discuss the challenges that heterogeneity in the freight market poses for the estimation of unit values to be used in cost-benefit analysis. The paper will cover the design of the three choice experiments used in this study, and the estimated values of TTS and TTV using logit models based on data from the three choice experiments. The results indicate clear differences in values for carriers and shippers; hired transport and own account freight. Characteristics of the cargo/shipment have significant relevance for the values. Some of the particularities of a TTS and TTV for freight transport, such as the issues related to the unit values, will be addressed along with lessons from the study and recommendations for further studies.

[1]  Tony Fowkes,et al.  The design and interpretation of freight stated preference experiments seeking to elicit behavioural valuations of journey attributes , 2007 .

[2]  John M. Rose,et al.  Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: Implications for willingness to pay , 2009 .

[3]  J. Bates,et al.  The valuation of reliability for personal travel , 2001 .

[4]  Anders Karlström,et al.  The value of reliability , 2007 .

[5]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings , 2006 .

[6]  D. Hensher,et al.  Accommodating Risk in the Valuation of Expected Travel Time Savings , 2013 .

[7]  Juha Mikola,et al.  Value of Time in Freight Transport in Finland , 2000 .

[8]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  VALUATION OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS AND PREDICTABILITY IN CONGESTED CONDITIONS FOR HIGHWAY USER-COST ESTIMATION , 1999 .

[9]  M. Fosgerau,et al.  Travel time variability: Definition and valuation , 2008 .

[10]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  Logistics managers’ stated preferences for freight service attributes , 2005 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[12]  Marco Kouwenhoven,et al.  A pilot study into the perception of unreliability of travel times using in-depth interviews , 2007 .

[13]  J. Polak,et al.  Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data , 2010 .

[14]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes , 2004 .

[15]  Inge Vierth Värdering av minskad transporttid och minskad variation i transporttid för godstransporter : förstudie , 2010 .

[16]  Marco Kouwenhoven,et al.  Preliminary monetary values for the reliability of travel times in freight transport , 2009 .

[17]  P. Wakker Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity , 2010 .

[18]  Clifford Winston,et al.  A Disaggregate Model of the Demand for Intercity Freight Transportation , 1981 .