Co-creating socio-technical scenarios for net-zero emission pathways: comparison of five national case studies

[1]  Just transition governance to avoid socio-economic impacts of lignite phase-out: The case of Western Macedonia, Greece , 2023, The Extractive Industries and Society.

[2]  H. Doukas,et al.  A stakeholder-informed modelling study of Greece's energy transition amidst an energy crisis: the role of natural gas and climate ambition , 2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition.

[3]  S. Mittal,et al.  Climate change mitigation scenario databases should incorporate more non-IAM pathways , 2022, Joule.

[4]  L. Pereira,et al.  Disruptive seeds: a scenario approach to explore power shifts in sustainability transformations , 2022, Sustainability Science.

[5]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Eliciting knowledge from stakeholders to identify critical issues of the transition to climate neutrality in Greece, the Nordic Region, and the European Union , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[6]  Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle,et al.  Designing synergetic and sustainable policy mixes - a methodology to address conflictive environmental issues , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[7]  H. Doukas,et al.  A comparative study of biodiesel in Brazil and Argentina: An integrated systems of innovation perspective , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[8]  P. Koundouri,et al.  A System Innovation Approach for Science-Stakeholder Interface: Theory and Application to Water-Land-Food-Energy Nexus , 2022, Frontiers in Water.

[9]  P. Plötz,et al.  Where is the EU headed given its current climate policy? A stakeholder-driven model inter-comparison. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[11]  Alexandros Nikas,et al.  Perspective of comprehensive and comprehensible multi-model energy and climate science in Europe , 2021, Energy.

[12]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Models on the wrong track: Model-based electricity supply scenarios in Switzerland are not aligned with the perspectives of energy experts and the public , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  H. Doukas,et al.  The UK and German Low-Carbon Industry Transitions from a Sectoral Innovation and System Failures Perspective , 2020, Energies.

[14]  H. Doukas,et al.  Many Miles to Paris: A Sectoral Innovation System Analysis of the Transport Sector in Norway and Canada in Light of the Paris Agreement , 2020, Sustainability.

[15]  Oliver Foss Hessner Hansen,et al.  Stakeholder analysis with regard to a recent European restriction proposal on microplastics , 2020, PloS one.

[16]  J. Psarras,et al.  Sustainable and socially just transition to a post-lignite era in Greece: a multi-level perspective , 2020, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy.

[17]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Transformative policy mixes in socio-technical scenarios: The case of the low-carbon transition of the German electricity system (2010–2050) , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[18]  F. Geels,et al.  Socio-technical scenarios as a methodological tool to explore social and political feasibility in low-carbon transitions: Bridging computer models and the multi-level perspective in UK electricity generation (2010–2050) , 2020 .

[19]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Low carbon transitions pathways in mobility: Applying the MLP in a combined case study and simulation bridging analysis of passenger transport in the Netherlands , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[20]  Florian Kern,et al.  The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions , 2019, Research Policy.

[21]  P. Newell,et al.  The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[22]  Rika Preiser,et al.  Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: visions of a good Anthropocene in southern Africa , 2018 .

[23]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization : characteristics and implications for future research , 2017 .

[24]  Joeri H. Wesseling,et al.  Lock-in of mature innovation systems, The transformation toward clean concrete in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[25]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[26]  M. Reed,et al.  The ripple effect: Institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours , 2016 .

[27]  I. Fazey,et al.  Three horizons: A pathways practice for transformation , 2016 .

[28]  R. Pindyck.  The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy , 2015, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[29]  A. Tuominen,et al.  Future transport systems: long-term visions and socio-technical transitions , 2014 .

[30]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool , 2010 .

[31]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Sociotechnical scenarios as a new policy tool to explore system innovations: Co-evolution of technology and society in The Netherland’s electricity domain , 2004 .

[32]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain , 2002 .