Do specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing?

This study examined whether specific relevance instructions affect transfer appropriate processing. Undergraduates (n = 52) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading question conditions that asked them what-questions, why-questions, or to read for understanding (i.e., control condition). There were no differences in reading time across conditions for sentences targeted by the pre-reading questions. There were three main findings with respect to cued recall. First, participants in the experimental conditions did better on questions that had greater similarity to relevance instructions than questions that had lesser similarity to relevance instructions. Second, participants in the experimental conditions did better on questions that had greater similarity to relevance instructions than the participants in the other conditions on those same questions. Third, participants in the control condition recalled equal amounts of information for both question. The results suggest that specific relevance instructions promote transfer appropriate processing and affect the quality of memory for text.

[1]  Meredyth Daneman,et al.  Compensating for a Limited Working Memory Capacity During Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2007 .

[2]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[3]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Comprehension and Memory , 1999 .

[4]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. , 2002 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  How does background information improve memory for text content? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Matthew T. McCrudden,et al.  Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing , 2007 .

[7]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children , 1999 .

[8]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Effects of coherence and relevance on shallow and deep text processing. , 2002 .

[9]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Does the Influence of Reading Purpose on Reports of Strategic Text Processing Depend on Students' Topic Knowledge? , 2004 .

[10]  E. Goetz,et al.  Differences in the use of selective attention by more successful and less successful tenth-grade readers. , 1990 .

[11]  Paul F. Merrill,et al.  The Effects of Behavioral Objectives on Learning: A Review of Empirical Studies1 , 1973 .

[12]  Benjamin D. Jee,et al.  How goals affect the organization and use of domain knowledge , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Perspective Effects on Online Text Processing , 2002 .

[14]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning , 2005 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[17]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Exploring How Relevance Instructions Affect Personal Reading Intentions, Reading Goals and Text Processing: A Mixed Methods Study. , 2010 .

[18]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  The Path to Competence: A Lifespan Developmental Perspective on Reading , 2005 .

[19]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .

[20]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. , 1999 .

[21]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Why Are Poor Comprehenders Inefficient Searchers? An Investigation into the Effects of Text Representation and Spatial Memory on the Ability To Locate Information in Text. , 2000 .

[22]  M. J. Billington,et al.  Goal-guided learning from text: inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[23]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  The Effects of Tasks on Integrating Information From Multiple Documents , 2008 .

[24]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Contributions of Student Questioning and Prior Knowledge to Construction of Knowledge from Reading Information Text , 2006 .

[25]  R. Reynolds.  Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research , 1992 .

[26]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[27]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Interactive effects of text-based and task-based importance on learning from text , 1993 .

[28]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Understanding Reading Comprehension: Current and Future Contributions of Cognitive Science , 1997 .

[29]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[30]  Ernest T. Goetz,et al.  Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Technical Report No. 266. , 1982 .

[31]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[32]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Taking different perspectives on a story. , 1977 .

[34]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .

[35]  Panayiota Kendeou,et al.  Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Effects of Information Search Tasks on the Comprehension of Instructional Text , 2001 .

[37]  T. Gary Waller,et al.  Mathemagenic Behaviours and Efficiency in Learning from Prose Materials: Review, Critique and Recommendations , 1976 .