Dynamic similarity promotes interpersonal coordination joint

movement has been for and dynamic laws of motion that are to all been derived. Yet, every individual differently from everyone else harder/smoother, etc.). We propose here an index of such variability, namely an individual motor signature (IMS) able to capture the subtle differences in the way each of us moves. We show that the IMS of a person is time-invariant and that it significantly differs from those of other individuals. This allows us to quantify the dynamic similarity, a measure of rapport between dynamics of different individuals’ movements, and demonstrate that it facilitates coordination during interaction. We use our measure to confirm a key prediction of the theory of similarity that coordination between two individuals performing a joint-action task is higher if their motions share similar dynamic features. Furthermore, we use a virtual avatar driven by an interactive cognitive architecture based on feedback control theory to explore the effects of different kinematic features of the avatar motion on coordination with human players.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Moving attractive virtual agent improves interpersonal coordination stability. , 2015, Human movement science.

[2]  Ludovic Marin,et al.  Social priming enhances interpersonal synchronization and feeling of connectedness towards schizophrenia patients , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Jason Friedman,et al.  Corrective jitter motion shows similar individual frequencies for the arm and the finger , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Julien Lagarde,et al.  Movement similarities and differences during social interaction: The scientific foundation of the ALTEREGO European project , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[5]  Chao Zhai,et al.  A novel cognitive architecture for a human-like virtual player in the mirror game , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[6]  Chao Zhai,et al.  Adaptive tracking control of a virtual player in the mirror game , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Bodily synchronization underlying joke telling , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  J. Kelso,et al.  The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Influence of stimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Gregory W. Corder,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2014 .

[11]  U. Alon,et al.  Individuality and Togetherness in Joint Improvised Motion , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  J. Krause,et al.  The role of individuality in collective group movement , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Armin Fuchs,et al.  Beyond the blank slate: routes to learning new coordination patterns depend on the intrinsic dynamics of the learner—experimental evidence and theoretical model , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Self-recognition of avatar motion: how do I know it's me? , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Lakens,et al.  If They Move in Sync, They Must Feel in Sync: Movement Synchrony Leads to Attributions of Rapport and Entitativity , 2011 .

[17]  S. McEachern,et al.  The need for an integrated theoretical framework for researching the influence of group diversity on performance , 2009 .

[18]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Virtual Partner Interaction (VPI): Exploring Novel Behaviors via Coordination Dynamics , 2009, PloS one.

[19]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[20]  J. Kelso,et al.  Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[21]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Issartel,et al.  Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “can we march to the beat of our own drum?” , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  T. Pyszczynski,et al.  Seeing I to I: a pathway to interpersonal connectedness. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[26]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  The Earth Mover's distance is the Mallows distance: some insights from statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[27]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1999 .

[28]  L. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover''s Distance: Lower Bounds and Invariance under Translation , 1997 .

[29]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  P G Zanone,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Turvey,et al.  Maintenance tendency in co-ordinated rhythmic movements: Relative fluctuations and phase , 1988, Neuroscience.

[33]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  V. Folkes,et al.  Forming Relationships and the Matching Hypothesis , 1982 .

[35]  Rosa Sullivan,et al.  The Mirror Game , 1974 .

[36]  DAVID G. KENDALL,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics , 1947, Nature.

[37]  Angelika Foerster,et al.  Coordination Neural Behavioral And Social Dynamics , 2016 .

[38]  M. Muskulus,et al.  Wasserstein distances in the analysis of time series and dynamical systems , 2011 .

[39]  J. Tupin Behavioral physiology. , 1976, Science.