A metabolomics-based strategy for identification of gene targets for phenotype improvement and its application to 1-butanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BackgroundTraditional approaches to phenotype improvement include rational selection of genes for modification, and probability-driven processes such as laboratory evolution or random mutagenesis. A promising middle-ground approach is semi-rational engineering, where genetic modification targets are inferred from system-wide comparison of strains. Here, we have applied a metabolomics-based, semi-rational strategy of phenotype improvement to 1-butanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.ResultsNineteen yeast single-deletion mutant strains with varying growth rates under 1-butanol stress were subjected to non-targeted metabolome analysis by GC/MS, and a regression model was constructed using metabolite peak intensities as predictors and stress growth rates as the response. From this model, metabolites positively and negatively correlated with growth rate were identified including threonine and citric acid. Based on the assumption that these metabolites were linked to 1-butanol tolerance, new deletion strains accumulating higher threonine or lower citric acid were selected and subjected to tolerance measurement and metabolome analysis. The new strains exhibiting the predicted changes in metabolite levels also displayed significantly higher growth rate under stress over the control strain, thus validating the link between these metabolites and 1-butanol tolerance.ConclusionsA strategy for semi-rational phenotype improvement using metabolomics was proposed and applied to the 1-butanol tolerance of S. cerevisiae. Metabolites correlated with growth rate under 1-butanol stress were identified, and new mutant strains showing higher growth rate under stress could be selected based on these metabolites. The results demonstrate the potential of metabolomics in semi-rational strain engineering.

[1]  Hiroshi Shimizu,et al.  Design of Superior Cell Factories Based on Systems Wide Omics Analysis , 2012 .

[2]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production , 2006, Science.

[3]  Chikara Furusawa,et al.  Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, FEMS yeast research.

[4]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology 6; Article number 378; doi:10.1038/msb.2010.33 Citation: Molecular Systems Biology 6:378 , 2022 .

[5]  M. Dunlop.  Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels , 2011, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[6]  E. Papoutsakis,et al.  A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: From biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. , 2010, Metabolic engineering.

[7]  Simone Rochfort,et al.  Metabolomics reviewed: a new "omics" platform technology for systems biology and implications for natural products research. , 2005, Journal of natural products.

[8]  Arjen Lommen,et al.  MetAlign: interface-driven, versatile metabolomics tool for hyphenated full-scan mass spectrometry data preprocessing. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Global organization of metabolic fluxes in the bacterium Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature.

[10]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the Gene Ontology (GO) , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  Plant metabolomics: potential for practical operation. , 2005, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[12]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  Current metabolomics: practical applications. , 2013, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[13]  Multiple induced mutagenesis for improvement of ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus , 2010, Biotechnology Letters.

[14]  U. Sauer.  Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. , 2001, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[15]  J. Hartman,et al.  Systematic quantification of gene interactions by phenotypic array analysis , 2004, Genome Biology.

[16]  Yoshio Katakura,et al.  Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[17]  O. Fiehn.  Metabolomics – the link between genotypes and phenotypes , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[18]  Yong-Su Jin,et al.  Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  Alyssa M. Redding,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[20]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  A novel application of metabolomics in vertebrate development. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Pao-Yang Chen,et al.  Evolution, genomic analysis, and reconstruction of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  K. Verstrepen,et al.  Large-scale robot-assisted genome shuffling yields industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts with increased ethanol tolerance , 2015, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[24]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Y. M. Tikunov,et al.  MSClust: a tool for unsupervised mass spectra extraction of chromatography-mass spectrometry ion-wise aligned data , 2011, Metabolomics.

[26]  S. Wold,et al.  Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS) , 2002 .

[27]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  Construction of a metabolome library for transcription factor-related single gene mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[28]  Matthias Reuss,et al.  In vivo dynamics of glycolysis in Escherichia coli shows need for growth‐rate dependent metabolome analysis , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[29]  J. Hartman,et al.  Buffering of deoxyribonucleotide pool homeostasis by threonine metabolism , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Sang Yup Lee,et al.  Systems biotechnology for strain improvement. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[31]  Eiichiro Fukusaki,et al.  Prediction of Japanese green tea ranking by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-based hydrophilic metabolite fingerprinting. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[32]  F. Kolisis,et al.  Combinatorial approaches for inverse metabolic engineering applications , 2012, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[33]  Jae Sung Cho,et al.  Global physiological understanding and metabolic engineering of microorganisms based on omics studies , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[34]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Combinatorial engineering of microbes for optimizing cellular phenotype. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[35]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Selection and optimization of microbial hosts for biofuels production. , 2008, Metabolic engineering.

[36]  D. Kell,et al.  A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  A. Demain,et al.  Genetic improvement of processes yielding microbial products. , 2006, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[38]  Masanori Arita,et al.  GC/MS based metabolomics: development of a data mining system for metabolite identification by using soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[39]  Eiichiro Fukusaki,et al.  Metabolomics‐based systematic prediction of yeast lifespan and its application for semi‐rational screening of ageing‐related mutants , 2010, Aging cell.