Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for String Stable Mixed Traffic: Benchmark and Human-Centered Design

With the emergence of vehicle-to-vehicle communication technology, cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) cars can be expected in the near future. In this paper, novel criteria for string stability are proposed for mixed traffic platoons that consist of both automated and manual driving cars. A mixed traffic string stability definition is proposed to guarantee the boundedness of the motion states fluctuation upstream as well as the safety of the entire platoon. With proper arrangements of the platoon sequence as well as mild restrictions on the leading car’s velocity overshoot, the proposed mixed traffic string stability can be realized via some suitable controller design for the automated cars. The benchmark controller with feedback and feedforward path is first used to verify the above results with rigorous proof. Furthermore, a human-centered CACC system is designed to improve both physical and psychological comfort of a driver under the guarantee of mixed traffic string stability. The action-point car-following model is adapted to quantify the driver’s psychological comfort in combination with the quantification of physical comfort based on jerk. A model predictive control-like blending ratio controller is developed to obtain the optimal time headway in the feedback controller for tradeoffs among driver comfort, fuel efficiency, and traffic throughput under string stability constraints. Finally, a seven-car CACC mixed traffic platoon scenario is simulated. Compared with the benchmark CACC controller design, the human-centered CACC design is shown to largely improve the driving comfort.

[1]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  Dynamic Coupling in Vehicles Under Automatic Control , 1994 .

[2]  Yang Zheng,et al.  Distributed Model Predictive Control for Heterogeneous Vehicle Platoons Under Unidirectional Topologies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  MPC based vehicular following control considering both fuel economy and tracking capability , 2008, 2008 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[4]  Huei Peng,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Cruise Control with Guaranteed String Stability , 1999 .

[5]  Feng Gao,et al.  A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems , 2010 .

[6]  Dawn M. Tilbury,et al.  Blending of human and obstacle avoidance control for a high speed mobile robot , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[7]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Coherent moving states in highway traffic , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Rosario Toscano Structured Controllers for Uncertain Systems , 2013 .

[9]  Yue Wang,et al.  Human-Aware Autonomous Control for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) Systems , 2015, HRI 2015.

[10]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Longitudinal control of heavy trucks in mixed traffic: environmental and fuel economy considerations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Hong Liu,et al.  Model predictive control for adaptive cruise control with multi-objectives: comfort, fuel-economy, safety and car-following , 2010 .

[12]  T. Nagatani,et al.  Traffic jams induced by fluctuation of a leading car. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  Huei Peng,et al.  String stability analysis of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles , 2000 .

[15]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Model Predictive Multi-Objective Vehicular Adaptive Cruise Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Prabir Barooah,et al.  On Achieving Size-Independent Stability Margin of Vehicular Lattice Formations With Distributed Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[18]  Hiroo Ota DISTANCE HEADWAY BEHAVIOR BETWEEN VEHICLES FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF PROXEMICS. , 1994 .

[19]  Charles A. Desoer,et al.  Longitudinal control of a platoon of vehicles with no communication of lead vehicle information: a system level study , 1993 .

[20]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Analysis of traffic flow with mixed manual and semiautomated vehicles , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[22]  Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.  A Review of Communication, Driver Characteristics, and Controls Aspects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Lp String Stability of Cascaded Systems: Application to Vehicle Platooning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[24]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[25]  Charles A. Desoer,et al.  Longitudinal Control of a Platoon of Vehicles with no Communication of Lead Vehicle Information , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[26]  E. Montroll,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following , 1958 .

[27]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[28]  Stephen Jones,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Human Factors Analysis , 2013 .

[29]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  An overview of vehicular platoon control under the four-component framework , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).