Modelling pin-point plant cover data along an environmental gradient

When plant cover is measured by the pin-point method the results are traditionally reported by the observed mean and the variance of the number of hits. However, in order to model plant cover data it would be advantageous to have a model that describes the stochastic ecological processes. Here a hierarchical stochastic model of zero-inflated generalised binomial distributed data is introduced. The model specifically represents two important characteristics of the distribution of plant species: plant species do not occur everywhere possible within their realised niche and the data will consequently be zero-inflated, and even if a plant species do occur in the area the number of hits typically will be overdispersed relative to the binomial distribution due to a non-random distribution of individual plants. The stochastic model is applied using different regression models with a varying degree of complexity on hierarchical pin-point cover data of 155 plant species at 10 different habitat types regressed on the measured carbon/nitrogen ratio. The plant cover data displayed a considerable amount of intra-class positive correlation with an average intra-class correlation of 0.31. The degree of intra-class positive correlation differed significantly among habitat types, and generally, it may be concluded that it is critical to take intra-class correlation into account when modelling pin-point cover data.

[1]  D. Hall Zero‐Inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression with Random Effects: A Case Study , 2000, Biometrics.

[2]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[3]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[4]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Population size and the risk of local extinction: empirical evidence from rare plants , 2004 .

[5]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[6]  Y. Hori,et al.  Frequency distribution models for spatial patterns of vegetation abundance , 2008 .

[7]  S. Mingoti A note on the sample size required in sequential tests for the generalized binomial distribution , 2003 .

[8]  C. Romão,et al.  Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. , 1996 .

[9]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  Modelling ecological presence–absence data along an environmental gradient: threshold levels of the environment , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[10]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  SPECIES CO‐OCCURRENCE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF J. M. DIAMOND'S ASSEMBLY RULES MODEL , 2002 .

[11]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[12]  G. Heil,et al.  “Calluna”, a simulation model for evaluation of impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on dry heathlands , 1993 .

[13]  Asymptotics and Criticality for a Correlated Bernoulli Process , 2004 .

[14]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[15]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[16]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  C. Damgaard Evolutionary ecology of plant-plant interactions An empirical modelling approach , 2004 .

[18]  C. Damgaard Modeling plant competition along an environmental gradient , 2003 .

[19]  C. Stevens,et al.  Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on the Species Richness of Grasslands , 2004, Science.

[20]  Jay M. Ver Hoef,et al.  Space—time zero‐inflated count models of Harbor seals , 2007 .

[21]  S. Levin,et al.  Theories of Simplification and Scaling of Spatially Distributed Processes , 2011 .

[22]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  BAYES AND EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR DATA ANALYSIS , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[23]  P. Greig-Smith,et al.  QUANTITATIVE PLANT ECOLOGY , 1959 .

[24]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants , 2000 .

[25]  Y. Qu,et al.  Symmetric Bernoulli Distributions and Generalized Binomial Distributions , 1993 .

[26]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[27]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[28]  J. Burdon,et al.  Frequency-dependent selection in a wild plant-pathogen system , 1995, Oecologia.

[29]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[30]  C. Damgaard Inference from plant competition experiments: the effect of spatial covariance , 2004 .

[31]  D. Tilman,et al.  Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[32]  Martin Kent,et al.  Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach , 1992 .

[33]  Alain Franc,et al.  The effect of colonization and competition processes on the relation between disturbance and diversity in plant communities. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Stephen L. Rathbun,et al.  A spatial zero-inflated poisson regression model for oak regeneration , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[35]  Tomáš Herben,et al.  Spatio-temporal Patterns in Grassland Communities , 1999 .

[36]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[37]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  A DYNAMICAL SYSTEM FOR NEIGHBORHOODS INPLANT COMMUNITIES , 2000 .

[38]  Mike Ashmore,et al.  Modelling the impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on Calluna‐dominated ecosystems in the UK , 2004 .

[39]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .