Knowledge Spillovers: Cooperation between Universities and KIBS

Knowledge is increasingly perceived as a fulcral factor to company competitiveness. As the transfer of knowledge is one of the key functions of knowledge intensive business services (KIBS), this research seeks to analyse how the transfer of knowledge takes place between the higher education sector and KIBS type firms. The empirical results show that cooperation between KIBS and universities occurs irrespective of the typology (whether professional or technological in focus). We also empirically establish how geographic proximity is the factor bearing greatest influence over cooperation while such cooperation proves to have a positive impact on the company capacity to innovate. We furthermore find that this innovation capacity also drives a positive company financial performance.

[1]  F. Martin,et al.  The economic impact of Canadian university R&D , 1998 .

[2]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[3]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .

[4]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  The Economic Development Impacts of Universities on Regions: Do Size and Distance Matter? , 2006 .

[5]  Jun Koo.  Determinants of Localized Technology Spillovers: Role of Regional and Industrial Attributes , 2007 .

[6]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel Felsenstein,et al.  High Technology Firms and Metropolitan Locational Choice in Israel; A Look at the Determinants , 1996 .

[8]  Denis Maillat,et al.  New technologies and transformation of regional structures in Europe: The role of the milieu , 1992 .

[9]  A. Koch,et al.  Regional innovation systems and the foundation of knowledge intensive business services. A comparative study in Bremen, Munich, and Stuttgart, Germany , 2006 .

[10]  R. Camagni.  Technological Change, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards a Dynamic Theory of Economic Space , 1991 .

[11]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Location Attributes and Start‐ups in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services , 2009 .

[12]  Micheal J. Kelly,et al.  Managing Alliance Relationships: Key Challenges in the Early Stages of Collaboration , 2002 .

[13]  A. James,et al.  The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change , 2003 .

[14]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[15]  A. Spithoven,et al.  Formal R&D Management and Strategic Decision Making in Small Firms in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services , 2013 .

[16]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[18]  Desalegn Abraha Gebrekidan,et al.  Interorganizational cooperation: a new view of strategic alliances: The case of Swedish firms in the international market , 2002 .

[19]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence , 2010 .

[20]  Foreign investors and their perceptions of socioinstitutional and entrepreneurial environment in the Czech Republic: A pilot study , 2008 .

[21]  Emmanuel Muller.  Innovation interactions between knowledge-intensive business services and small and medium-sized enterprises : an analysis in terms of evolution, knowledge and territories , 2001 .

[22]  A. Inzelt,et al.  THE INNOVATION ACTIVITY IN A STAGNATING COUNTY OF HUNGARY , 2006 .

[23]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[24]  Nader A. Salman,et al.  Indirect Networks: An Intangible Resource for Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[25]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship: The Birth, Growth and Demise of Entrepreneurial Firms , 2010 .

[26]  Marcus Holgersson.  Patent Management in Entrepreneurial SMEs: A Literature Review and an Empirical Study of Innovation Appropriation, Patent Propensity, and Motives , 2013 .

[27]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[28]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Urban Hierarchy or Local Buzz? High-Order Producer Service and (or) Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Location in Canada, 1991–2001 , 2008 .

[29]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[30]  Monica Matei-Chesnoiu.  Geography and Trade , 2012 .

[31]  M. Percoco,et al.  Service industry and cumulative growth in the regions of Europe , 2009 .

[32]  P. Hertog,et al.  Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of innovation , 1995 .

[33]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination , 2008 .

[34]  Pamela Mueller,et al.  Exploring the Knowledge Filter: How Entrepreneurship and University-Industry Relationships Drive Economic Growth ∗ , 2006 .

[35]  Lucia Cusmano,et al.  Modes of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services evidence from Lombardy , 2009 .

[36]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[37]  Attila Varga,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration and Technological Change , 2005 .

[38]  M. Freel,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services , 2006 .

[39]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[40]  G. Derrick,et al.  The Role of Research Incentives in Medical Research Organisations , 2013 .

[41]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[42]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Truth for Its Own Sake: Academic Culture and Technology Transfer at Johns Hopkins University , 2004 .

[43]  E. Malecki,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Space in the Network Age , 2004 .

[44]  David Zilberman,et al.  UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS: IMPACTS ON LOCAL AND U.S. ECONOMIES , 1993 .

[45]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  The economic value of higher education , 1989 .

[46]  The Economic Value of Higher Education , 1989 .

[47]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The University and Economic Development: The Case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore , 1994 .

[48]  P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,et al.  Nature and Dynamics of Appropriability: Strategies for Appropriating Returns on Innovation , 2007 .

[49]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[50]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in Services: Issues at Stake and Trends : Studies on Innovation Matters Related to the Implementation of the Community "Innovation and SMEs Programme" , 2004 .

[51]  Chia-Liang Hung,et al.  The Relationship between Team Communication, Structure, and Academic R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence of the National Telecommunication Program in Taiwan , 2013 .

[52]  A. Pike,et al.  Editorial: Regional Studies: 40 Years and More … , 2007 .

[53]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  The wealth of regions , 1995 .

[54]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[55]  E. Autio,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND COUNTRY-LEVEL DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH ASPIRATION IN NEW VENTURES (INTERACTIVE PAPER) , 2007 .

[56]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Mobility of inventors and the geography of knowledge spillovers. New evidence on US data , 2006 .

[57]  A. Isserman.  State Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States: A Survey Article , 1993 .

[58]  T. Burgess,et al.  The Impact of R&D‐Specific Factors on the Attractiveness of Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Enterprises as Partners Vis‐À‐Vis Alliance Formation in Large Emerging Economies , 2013 .

[59]  A. Zenker,et al.  Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems , 2001 .

[60]  B. Tether,et al.  The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms , 2008 .

[61]  Marja Toivonen,et al.  Expertise as business : long-term development and future prospects of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) , 2004 .

[62]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Spin-offs from research centers at a research university☆ , 2000 .

[63]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Value Creation from the Innovation Environment: Partnership Strategies in University Spin‐Outs , 2013 .

[64]  G. Briefs.  Business cycles , 1949 .

[65]  Attila Varga.  Universities, knowledge transfer and regional development : geography, entrepreneurship and policy , 2009 .

[66]  Catherine P. Ailes,et al.  Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers , 2002 .

[67]  Emmanuel Muller,et al.  The key dimensions of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) analysis: a decade of evolution , 2007 .

[68]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity , 1998 .

[69]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[70]  D. Dill,et al.  Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly , 1995 .

[71]  Thorsten Staake,et al.  Managing Technology Development Teams – Exploring the Case of Microsytems and Nanosystems , 2013 .

[72]  Z. Ács,et al.  The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[73]  Jun Koo.  Agglomeration and spillovers in a simultaneous framework , 2005 .

[74]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Metropolitan Innovation Systems: Theory and Evidence from Three Metropolitan Regions in Europe , 2001 .

[75]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in services , 1997 .

[76]  R. Keith Schwer,et al.  Regional Innovative Capacity with Endogenous Employment: Empirical Evidence from the U.S. , 2003 .

[77]  Mário Raposo,et al.  The role of Entrepreneurial Universities in interfacing Competitive Advantages: The Case of Beira Interior region (Portugal) , 2006 .

[78]  Philip Cooke,et al.  From Technopoles to Regional Innovation Systems: The Evolution of Localised Technology Development Policy , 2001 .

[79]  I. Miles.  Innovation in Services , 1995 .

[80]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Metropolitan Innovation Systems , 2001 .