An integrated strategy for fleet maintenance planning

Purpose Conventionally, fleet maintenance decisions are made based on the level of repair (LOR) analysis. A general assumption made during LOR analysis is the consideration of the lifetime distribution with constant failure rate (CFR). However, industries do use preventive maintenance (PM) to extend the life of such components, which in turn may affect the LOR decisions such as repair/move/discard. The CFR assumption does not allow the consideration of effect of PM in LOR analysis. The purpose of this paper is to develop a more practical LOR analysis approach, considering the time-dependent failure rate (TDFR) of components and the effect of PM. Design/methodology/approach In the proposed methodology, first, a detailed life cycle model considering the effect of various parameters related to LOR and PM is developed. A simulation-based genetic algorithm approach is then used to obtain an integrated solution for LOR and PM schedule decisions. The model is also evaluated for the various cases of quality of maintenance measured in terms of degree of restoration. Findings The results, from the illustrative example for a multi-indenture and multi-echelon fleet maintenance network, show that the proposed integrated strategy leads to better LCC performance compare to the conventional approach. Additionally, it is identified that the degree of restoration also affects the PM schedule as well as LOR decisions of the fleet system. Therefore, consideration of TDFR is important to truly optimize the LOR decisions. The proposed approach can be applied to fleet of any equipment. Research limitations/implications The approach is illustrated using a hypothetical example of an industrial system. A more complex system structure in terms of number of machines, types of machines (identical vs non-identical), number of echelons, possible repair actions at various echelons, etc. may be present for a particular industrial case. However, the approach presented is generic and can be extended to any system. Moreover, the aim of the paper is to highlight the importance of the considering PM and quality of maintenance in LOR decision making. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first work which considers the effect of PM and quality of maintenance on LOR analysis. Consideration of TDFR and imperfect maintenance while optimizing LOR decisions is a complex problem. Thus, the work is of high significance from the research point of view. Also, most of the real life fleet systems use PM to extend the life of the equipment. Thus, present paper is a more practical approach for LOR analysis of such systems.

[1]  Shaomin Wu,et al.  A novel repair model for imperfect maintenance , 2006 .

[2]  Eduardo Uchoa,et al.  A facility location and installation of resources model for level of repair analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  John W. H. Price,et al.  Maintenance scheduling to support the operation of manufacturing and production assets , 2006 .

[4]  Matthieu van der Heijden,et al.  Joint optimization of level of repair analysis and spare parts stocks , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Matthieu van der Heijden,et al.  An approximate approach for the joint problem of level of repair analysis and spare parts stocking , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  “Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms—level of repair analysis” , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Hoang Pham,et al.  Cost analysis on renewable full-service warranties for multi-component systems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence , 1997, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[9]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Opportunity-based block replacement , 1991 .

[10]  Manish Rawat and Bhupesh K Lad An Integrated Approach for Fleet Level Maintenance Planning , 2015 .

[11]  Süleyman Özekici Optimal Periodic Replacement of Multicomponent Reliability Systems , 1988, Oper. Res..

[12]  M. Kijima SOME RESULTS FOR REPAIRABLE SYSTEMS WITH GENERAL REPAIR , 1989 .

[13]  Matthieu van der Heijden,et al.  Practical extensions to a minimum cost flow model for level of repair analysis , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  H. Pham,et al.  Invited reviewImperfect maintenance , 1996 .

[15]  Matthieu van der Heijden,et al.  An efficient model formulation for level of repair analysis , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  Hongzhou Wang,et al.  A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Toshio Nakagawa,et al.  Optimum Policies When Preventive Maintenance is Imperfect , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[18]  Lilian L. Barros,et al.  A combinatorial approach to level of repair analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Tomasz Nowakowski,et al.  On problems of multicomponent system maintenance modelling , 2009, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[20]  Raman Pall,et al.  On the Application of a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm to the LORA-Spares Problem , 2012, OR.

[21]  Taoufik Bouachera,et al.  Level of Repair Analysis based on Genetic Algorithm with Tabu Search , 2010 .

[22]  Michael Patriksson,et al.  Preventive maintenance scheduling of multi-component systems with interval costs , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[23]  L. Barros The optimization of repair decision using life-cycle cost Parameters , 1998 .

[24]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: a review , 2008 .

[25]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Optimal maintenance models with minimal repair, periodic overhaul and complete renewal , 1998 .

[26]  Shaomin Wu,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Preventive Maintenance Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[27]  Robertus Johannes Ida Basten,et al.  Designing logistics support systems : level of repair analysis and spare parts inventories , 2010 .

[28]  Jaime H. Ortega,et al.  Optimal replacement and overhaul decisions with imperfect maintenance and warranty contracts , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..