Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.

Mechanical loading of the low back during lifting is a common cause of low back pain. In this study two-handed lifting is compared to one-handed lifting (with and without supporting the upper body with the free hand) while lifting over an obstacle. A 3-D linked segment model was combined with an EMG-assisted trunk muscle model to quantify kinematics and joint loads at the L5S1 joint. Peak total net moments (i.e., the net moment effect of all muscles and soft tissue spanning the joint) were found to be 10+/-3% lower in unsupported one-handed lifting compared to two-handed lifting, and 30+/-8% lower in supported compared to unsupported one-handed lifting. L5S1 joint forces also showed reductions, but not of the same magnitude (18+/-8% and 15+/-10%, respectively, for compression forces, and 15+/-17% and 11+/-14% respectively, for shear forces). Those reductions of low back load were mainly caused by a reduction of trunk and load moment arms relative to the L5S1 joint during peak loading, and, in the case of hand support, by a support force of about 250 N. Stretching one leg backward did not further reduce low back load estimates. Furthermore, one-handed lifting caused an 6+/-8 degrees increase in lateral flexion, a 9+/-5 degrees increase in twist and a 6+/-6 degrees decrease in flexion. Support with the free hand caused a small further increase in lumbar twisting. It is concluded that one-handed lifting, especially with hand support, reduces L5S1 loading but increases asymmetry in movements and moments about the lumbar spine.

[1]  I A Stokes,et al.  Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J R Potvin,et al.  Reduction in anterior shear forces on the L 4L 5 disc by the lumbar musculature. , 1991, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  P. Dolan,et al.  The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  M Gagnon,et al.  The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[6]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Anthropometric Relationships of Body and Body Segment Moments of Inertia , 1980 .

[7]  A. Hof,et al.  An explicit expression for the moment in multibody systems. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W S Marras,et al.  Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins , 2002, Ergonomics.

[9]  I. Kingma,et al.  Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model , 1996 .

[10]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[11]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance , 1997 .

[13]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of materials handling manipulators in short distance transfers of moderate mass objects: joint strength, spine forces and muscular antagonism. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[15]  King H. Yang,et al.  Mechanism of Disc Rupture: A Preliminary Report , 1991, Spine.

[16]  H. Farfan,et al.  The strength of the neural arch and the etiology of spondylolysis. , 1975, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[17]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Lumbar loading during lifting: a comparative study of three measurement techniques. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  S M McGill,et al.  A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R. D. Woittiez,et al.  A three‐dimensional muscle model: A quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles , 1984, Journal of morphology.

[20]  R. Norman,et al.  Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: towards development of a hybrid approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[22]  W S Marras,et al.  Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[23]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  R W Norman,et al.  Effects of an anatomically detailed erector spinae model on L4/L5 disc compression and shear. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Human Lumbar Vertebrae , 1989, Spine.

[27]  W S Marras,et al.  A literature review of low back disorder surveillance measures and risk factors. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[29]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Sensitivity of single-equivalent trunk extensor muscle models to anatomical and functional assumptions. , 1999 .