Sharing seed and knowledge: farmer to farmer dissemination of agroforestry technologies in western Kenya

Although there’s increasing emphasis on farmer-led extension in rural development, very few studies have been done to understand the social processes involved. This study was undertaken to identify farm and farmer characteristics that may influence dissemination of seed and knowledge of improved fallows and biomass transfer, to whom, how and what is disseminated. This was done by carrying out a formal and informal survey involving a random sample of 120 farmers from Siaya and Vihiga districts of western Kenya who were involved in a pilot project on soil fertility replenishment by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) and Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI). A second survey involved 40 farmers, selected using the snowball sampling technique that were given seed and information by the first group of farmers. Descriptive statistics and logit regression models were used to analyze data. Results presented showed that seed and knowledge were mostly shared along kinship ties. Furthermore, informal social networks were found to be more effective for seed than knowledge. This calls for simplification of technical information by development professionals in order to help support farmers’ understanding and communication of complex principles. Farmers with leadership status in their groups, those who belonged to many groups and those with larger farm sizes were more likely to give out seed of improved fallows. These categories of farmers could be targeted to enhance the spread of technologies.

[1]  S. Franzel.  Socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[2]  S. Franzel,et al.  Scaling up the benefits of agroforestry research: Lessons learned and research challenges , 2001 .

[3]  C. Palm,et al.  Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in western Kenya: A review , 2000, Agroforestry Systems.

[4]  T. P. Tiwari,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF HILL FARMERS' AGRONOMIC PRACTICES IN NEPAL FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT IN MAIZE , 2004, Experimental Agriculture.

[5]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development , 1995, Agroforestry Systems.

[6]  M. Zeller,et al.  Improved tree fallows in smallholder maize production in Zambia: do initial testers adopt the technology? , 2005, Agroforestry Systems.

[7]  A. Lawrence,et al.  SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE THROUGH EXTENSION IN ASIA , 1997 .

[8]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Communication for Rural Innovation , 2004 .

[9]  N. Mudege,et al.  An ethnography of knowledge : knowledge production and dissemination in land resettlement areas in Zimbabwe: the case of Mupfurudzi , 2005 .

[10]  S. Franzel,et al.  Sesbania sesban improved fallows in eastern Zambia: Their inception, development and farmer enthusiasm , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  N. Nathaniels.  Cowpea, farmer field schools and farmer-to-farmer extension: a Benin case study. , 2005 .

[12]  J. Bentley,et al.  Going Public: A New Extension Method , 2003 .

[13]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[14]  S. Franzel,et al.  Who is using the new technology? The association of wealth status and gender with the planting of improved tree fallows in Eastern Province, Zambia , 2004 .

[15]  M. Spreen.  Rare Populations, Hidden Populations, and Link-Tracing Designs: What and Why? , 1992 .

[16]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Prospects for the use of corporate knowledge bases in the generation, management and communication of knowledge at a frontline agricultural research centre , 1997 .

[17]  K. Shepherd,et al.  Potential impact of agroforestry on soil nutrient balances at the farm scale in the East African Highlands , 2004, Fertilizer research.

[18]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[19]  D. Benor.  Agricultural Extension: The Training and Visit System , 1984 .

[20]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey , 1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[21]  P. Hebinck,et al.  The impact of agroforestry based soil fertility: replenishment practices on the poor in Western Kenya , 2005 .

[22]  B. Simpson,et al.  Farmer Field Schools and the Future of Agricultural Extension in Africa , 2002 .

[23]  E. van de. Fliert,et al.  Women and IPM : crop protection practices and strategies , 1999 .

[24]  M. Waithaka.  Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension , 2005 .

[25]  P. Drechsel,et al.  Soil Nutrient Depletion and Population Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Malthusian Nexus? , 2001 .

[26]  P. Hebinck,et al.  Cultural repertoires and socio-technological regimes: maize in Luoland , 2004 .

[27]  M. Waithaka,et al.  Adoption of fodder legumes technology through farmer-to-farmer extension approach , 2004 .

[28]  F. Kwesiga,et al.  The effect of short rotation Sesbania sesban planted fallows on maize yield , 1994 .

[29]  Simon Briscoe,et al.  Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology. , 1994 .

[30]  T. Irani,et al.  Extending technologies among small-scale farmers in Meru, Kenya: Ingredients for success in farmer groups , 2004 .

[31]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development , 1995 .

[32]  B. Jama,et al.  Scaling up adoption and impact of agroforestry technologies: Experiences from western Kenya , 2001 .

[33]  A. Salahuddin,et al.  Innovations in Rural Extension: Case Studies from Bangladesh , 2005 .

[34]  Javier M. Ekboir,et al.  Contending with Complexity: The Role of Evaluation in Implementing Sustainable Natural Resource Management , 2003 .