Visual templates in pattern generalization activity

In this research article, I present evidence of the existence of visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Such templates initially emerged from a 3-week design-driven classroom teaching experiment on pattern generalization involving linear figural patterns and were assessed for existence in a clinical interview that was conducted four and a half months after the teaching experiment using three tasks (one ambiguous, two well defined). Drawing on the clinical interviews conducted with 11 seventh- and eighth-grade students, I discuss how their visual templates have spawned at least six types of algebraic generalizations. A visual template model is also presented that illustrates the distributed and a dynamically embedded nature of pattern generalization involving the following factors: pattern goodness effect; knowledge/action effects; and the triad of stage-driven grouping, structural unit, and analogy.

[1]  Boon Liang Chua,et al.  Generalisation and perceptual agility: how did teachers fare in a quadratic generalising problem? , 2010 .

[2]  F. Rivera,et al.  Algebraic Reasoning through Patterns , 2009 .

[3]  A. Graham,et al.  Developing Thinking in Algebra , 2005 .

[4]  C. Hoyles,et al.  Visual and Symbolic Reasoning in Mathematics: Making Connections with Computers? , 1999 .

[5]  M. Mitchelmore,et al.  Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development , 2009 .

[6]  Michael D. Resnik,et al.  Mathematics as a science of patterns , 1997 .

[7]  W. Metzger,et al.  Laws of Seeing , 2006 .

[8]  On ‘False, Collusive Objectification’: Becoming Attuned to Self‐Censorship, Performance and Interviewer Biases in Qualitative Interviewing , 2008, International journal of social research methodology.

[9]  Brian E. Townsend,et al.  Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding? , 2006 .

[10]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Possibility and Necessity , 1987 .

[11]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[12]  Istvan S. N. Berkeley.  What the <0.70, 1.17, 0.99, 1.07> is a Symbol? , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[13]  F. Rivera,et al.  Abduction–induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra , 2007 .

[14]  Lesley Lee.  An Initiation into Algebraic Culture through Generalization Activities , 1996 .

[15]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[16]  Amy B. Ellis,et al.  How "Focusing Phenomena" in the Instructional Environment Support Individual Students' Generalizations , 2003 .

[17]  Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson,et al.  The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society , 1999 .

[18]  Marcus Giaquinto,et al.  Visual thinking in mathematics , 2007 .

[19]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Ferdinand Rivera,et al.  Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns , 2008 .

[21]  J. Lannin.  Generalization and Justification: The Challenge of Introducing Algebraic Reasoning Through Patterning Activities , 2005 .

[22]  Fred I. Dretske,et al.  Seeing, believing, and knowing , 1990 .

[23]  Carolyn Kieran,et al.  Approaches to Algebra - Perspectives for Research and Teaching , 1996 .

[24]  Philip J. Davis,et al.  Visual theorems , 1993 .

[25]  a Framework for analyzing geometric Pattern tasks , 2009 .

[26]  James A. Dixon,et al.  Embodiment and abstraction: Actions create relational representations , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Debra I. Johanning,et al.  A schematic–Theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking , 2004 .

[29]  Istvan S. N. Berkeley.  What the is a Symbol , 2008 .

[30]  Constance Kamii,et al.  Identification of Multiplicative Thinking in Children in Grades 1-5. , 1996 .

[31]  Raymond Duval.  A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics , 2006 .

[32]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives , 1995 .

[33]  Robert B. Davis.  Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education , 1984 .

[34]  E. Fischbein.  The theory of figural concepts , 1993 .

[35]  T. Cooper,et al.  Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking , 2008 .

[36]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Perspectives on School Algebra , 2002 .

[37]  Rina Zazkis,et al.  STRATEGIES: A STUDY OF STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING OF THE GROUP D4 , 1996 .

[38]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Curriculum Reform and Approaches to Algebra , 2001 .

[39]  W. Dörfler,et al.  En route from patterns to algebra: comments and reflections , 2008 .

[40]  Abraham Arcavi,et al.  The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics , 2003 .

[41]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  The Origins of Mathematical Knowledge in Childhood , 2007 .

[42]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.