An online premium? Characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students in Principles of Microeconomics

ABSTRACT The author uses data from two Principles of Microeconomics courses to examine differences in characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students. The analysis indicates that even in a traditional institution, the two delivery modes may be serving students with distinctly different backgrounds and characteristics. In terms of performance, students in the online section on average scored higher on assessments given at different points in the semester. The differential remains when accounting for potential selection bias arising from course choice and when using alternate models and measures of performance.

[1]  Scott England,et al.  Is distance learning really a substitute for on-site learning? Perceptions of faculty who teach undergraduate economics using both formats , 2013 .

[2]  Peter Navarro,et al.  Policy issues in the teaching of economics in cyberspace: research design, course design, and research results , 2000 .

[3]  Michael W. Watts,et al.  Teaching and Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics: A Fourth National Quinquennial Survey , 2011 .

[4]  Jane S. Lopus.  Effects of the High School Economics Curriculum on Learning in the College Principles Class , 1997 .

[5]  D. Stanley,et al.  Teaching and Learning Principles of Microeconomics Online: An Empirical Assessment , 2009 .

[6]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[7]  David R. Erickson,et al.  A Tale of Two Classrooms , 1997 .

[8]  Jeff Anstine,et al.  A Small Sample Study of Traditional and Online Courses with Sample Selection Adjustment , 2005 .

[9]  Oskar R. Harmon,et al.  Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? , 2007 .

[10]  P. Navarro,et al.  Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace , 2000 .

[11]  Peter Navarro,et al.  The power of cyberlearning: An empirical test , 1999, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[12]  M. A. Vachris,et al.  Teaching Principles of Economics without “Chalk and Talk”: The Experience of CNU Online , 1999 .

[13]  Cheryl J. Wachenheim,et al.  Final Exam Scores in Introductory Economics Courses: Effect of Course Delivery Method and Proctoring , 2009 .

[14]  Jan Tolar Modisette.  Supporting Online Students: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating Services , 2015 .

[15]  B. W. Brown,et al.  Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics , 2002 .

[16]  John Kane,et al.  "No Significant Distance" between Face-to-Face and Online Instruction: Evidence from Principles of Economics , 2004 .

[17]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. , 2013 .

[18]  Wayne A. Grove,et al.  Choosing a Proxy for Academic Aptitude , 2006 .

[19]  Peter Navarro,et al.  Economics in the Cyber Classroom , 2000 .

[20]  Peter Navarro,et al.  Economics in the Cyberclassroom , 2000 .

[21]  J. Siegfried.  Male-Female Differences in Economic Education: a Survey , 1979 .