Human Operator Response Speed, Frequency, and Flexibility: A Review and Analysis1

The innate and state-of-the-art limitations on human operator manual control speed, frequency, and flexibility are reviewed and analyzed. Advanced manual control techniques for overcoming these limitations are suggested and research relating to these suggestions is reviewed. It is concluded that a considerable increase in human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility could accrue from use of the suggested manual control techniques.

[1]  Michael J. Wargo,et al.  Muscle Action Potential and Hand Switch Disjunctive Reaction Times to Visual, Auditory, and Combined Visual-Auditory Displays , 1967 .

[2]  Andrew G. Pikler,et al.  Compensatory and Pursuit Tracking of Loudness , 1960 .

[3]  P. Bricker The identification of redundant stimulus patterns. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Predictive Control of Eye Tracking Movements , 1962 .

[5]  W D GARVEY,et al.  Differential effects of display lags and control lags on the performance of manual tracking systems. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  James E. Lebensohn,et al.  Receptors and Sensory Perception , 1955 .

[7]  William S. Spector Handbook of Biological Data , 1956 .

[8]  J. Mcgrath,et al.  Vigilance: a symposium , 1963 .

[9]  T. B. Sheridan,et al.  Dynamics of Human Operator Control Systems Using Tactile Feedback , 1962 .

[10]  C R Kelley,et al.  Human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility: a review, analysis and device demonstration. NASA Contract Rep NASA CR-874. , 1967, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[11]  D. H. Holding,et al.  Reaction Time and Tracking Ability , 1959 .

[12]  J. S. Barlow,et al.  EVOKED RESPONSES IN RELATION TO VISUAL PERCEPTION AND OCULOMOTOR REACTION TIMES IN MAN * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Two determinants of associative reaction time. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  S. Howard Bartley,et al.  RELATION OF INTENSITY AND DURATION OF BRIEF RETINAL STIMULATION BY LIGHT TO THE ELECTRICAL RESPONSE OF THE OPTIC CORTEX OF THE RABBIT , 1934 .

[15]  Luis De Florez,et al.  True Blind Flight , 1936 .

[16]  J. C. Bliss,et al.  Compensatory Tracking with Visual and Tactile Displays , 1966 .

[17]  G. Forbes,et al.  The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times. , 1945 .

[18]  Andrew G. Pikler,et al.  Compensatory and Pursuit Tracking of Pitch , 1963 .

[19]  D. T. McRuer,et al.  HUMAN PILOT DYNAMICS WITH VARIOUS MANIPULATORS. , 1966 .

[20]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Tactual perception - Experiments and models , 1967 .

[21]  K. J. W. Craik Theory of the human operator in control systems; the operator as an engineering system. , 1947 .

[22]  Hsiang-Tung Chang,et al.  An analysis of primary response of visual cortex to optic nerve stimulation in cats. , 1950, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  G. Weddell,et al.  The anatomy of cutaneous sensibility. , 1945, British medical bulletin.

[24]  John F. Fulton,et al.  Medical physiology and biophysics , 1960 .

[25]  Sven Froeberg,et al.  The relation between the magnitude of stimulus and the time of reaction , 1907 .

[26]  C. M. Louttit,et al.  Auto braking reaction times to visual vs. auditory warning signals , 1937 .

[27]  R. O. Besco Manual attitude control systems, volume II - Display format considerations , 1964 .

[28]  E. S. Robinson Work of the Integrated Organism. , 1934 .

[29]  R. Granit Receptors and Sensory Perception , 1955 .

[30]  C. Murchison,et al.  A handbook of general experimental psychology , 1934 .

[31]  G. H. Bishop,et al.  ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY OF THE LATERAL GENICULATE OF CATS FOLLOWING OPTIC NERVE STIMULI , 1940 .

[32]  J R Swink,et al.  Intersensory Comparisons of Reaction Time Using an Electro-Pulse Tactile Stimulus , 1966, Human factors.

[33]  Henry Wilson Pilot Error: Some Laboratory Experiments , 1949 .

[34]  John Brebner,et al.  Ensemble Size and Selective Response Times with a Constant Signal Rate , 1962 .

[35]  R. H. Seashore,et al.  Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet and jaws , 1941 .

[36]  M. Loeb,et al.  Rise and Decay Time in Vigilance for Weak Auditory and Cutaneous Stimuli , 1961 .

[37]  W M SMITH,et al.  Sensitivity to apparent movement in depth as a function of stimulus dimensionality. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  William S. Spector,et al.  Handbook of Biological Data , 1957, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[39]  C. B. Gibbs,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FREE-MOVING AND PRESSURE LEVERS IN A POSITIONAL CONTROL SYSTEM. , 1965 .

[40]  W. C. Howell,et al.  An Initial Evaluation of a Vibrotactile Display in Complex Control Tasks , 1959 .

[41]  Philip B. Sampson,et al.  THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE EYE AS A SOURCE OF CONTROL SIGNALS IN TRACKING , 1959 .

[42]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[43]  S. Hathaway,et al.  An action potential study of neuromuscular relations. , 1935 .

[44]  S. Howard Bartley,et al.  Optic Nerve Response to Retinal Stimulation in the Rabbit.∗ , 1940 .

[45]  J E CONKLIN Effect of control lag on performance in a tracking task. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Michael J. Wargo Delayed Sensory Feedback in Visual and Auditory Tracking , 1967 .

[47]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[48]  James F. Parker,et al.  Ability factors and component performance measures as predictors of complex tracking behavior. , 1960 .

[49]  H. W. Ades,et al.  CORTICAL RESPONSE OF THE ANESTHETIZED CAT TO GROSS PHOTIC AND ELECTRICAL AFFERENT STIMULATION , 1943 .

[50]  M A VINCE,et al.  Corrective Movements in a Pursuit Task 1 , 1948, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[51]  George G. Frost,et al.  A PREDICTOR DISPLAY FOR ORBITAL RENDEZVOUS. , 1967 .

[52]  A. B. Kristofferson,et al.  Attention in time discrimination and reaction time , 1965 .

[53]  K. J. Craik THEORY OF THE HUMAN OPERATOR IN CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1948 .

[54]  A. B. Kinnier Wilson,et al.  Muscle substitutes and myo-electric control , 1963 .

[55]  F. Taylor,et al.  Studies of tracking behavior; rate and time characteristics of simple corrective movements. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  John E. Thompson,et al.  Auditory displays. II. Comparison of auditory and visual tracking in one dimension. A. Discontinuous signals, simple course. , 1952 .

[57]  C. B. Gibbs The continuous regulation of skilled response by kinaesthetic feed back. , 1954, The British journal of medical psychology.

[58]  J. E. Conklin Linearity of the Tracking Performance Function , 1959 .

[59]  Z. A. Lomnicki,et al.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN OPERATORS IN COMPENSATORY TRACKING TASKS , 1961 .

[60]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Reaction Time to Cortical Stimulation , 1964, Science.

[61]  A. Bartz,et al.  Eye-movement latency, duration, and response time as a function of angular displacement. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  G. H. Wright,et al.  The latency of sensations of warmth due to radiation , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[63]  E. H. Kemp,et al.  ELECTRIC RESPONSES OF THE BRAIN STEM TO BILATERAL AUDITORY STIMULATION , 1937 .

[64]  A A CANFIELD,et al.  A study of reaction time to light and sound as related to increased positive radial acceleration. , 1949, The Journal of aviation medicine.

[65]  I. Pollack The Information of Elementary Auditory Displays , 1952 .

[66]  James L. Adams AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE TIME LAG DUE TO LONG TRANSMISSION DISTANCES UPON REMOTE CONTROL. PHASE II - VEHICLE EXPERIMENTS. PHASE III - CONCLUSIONS. , 1961 .

[67]  W. H. Teichner Recent studies of simple reaction time. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.