Visualizing myosin's power stroke in muscle contraction.

The long-standing swinging crossbridge or lever arm hypothesis for the motor action of myosin heads finds support in recent results from 3-D tomograms of insect flight muscle (IFM) fast frozen during active contraction and from both fluorescence polarization and X-ray diffraction during rapid stretches or releases of isometrically contracting fibers. The latter provide direct evidence for lever arm movements synchronous with force changes. Rebuilding the atomic model of nucleotide-free subfragment 1 (S1) to fit fast-frozen, active IFM crossbridges suggests a two-stage power stroke in which the catalytic domain rolls on actin from weak to strong binding; this is followed by a 5-nm lever arm swing of the light chain domain, which gives a total interaction distance of approx. 12 nm. Comparison of S1 crystal structures with in situ myosin heads suggests that actin binding may be necessary in order to view the full repertoire of myosin motor action. The differing positions of the catalytic domains of actin-attached myosin heads in contracting IFM suggest that both the actin-myosin binding energy and the hydrolysis of ATP may be used to cock the crossbridge and drive the power stroke.

[1]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  Elastic bending and active tilting of myosin heads during muscle contraction , 1998, Nature.

[2]  C A Smith,et al.  X-ray structure of the magnesium(II).ADP.vanadate complex of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain to 1.9 A resolution. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[3]  Roger Cooke,et al.  ADP release produces a rotation of the neck region of smooth myosin but not skeletal myosin , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  D. D. Thomas,et al.  A large and distinct rotation of the myosin light chain domain occurs upon muscle contraction. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Justin E. Molloy,et al.  The motor protein myosin-I produces its working stroke in two steps , 1999, Nature.

[6]  E. Reisler,et al.  Probing the conformational states of the SH1-SH2 helix in myosin: a cross-linking approach. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[7]  R. Cooke,et al.  Actomyosin interaction in striated muscle. , 1997, Physiological reviews.

[8]  Clara Franzini-Armstrong,et al.  Tomographic 3D Reconstruction of Quick-Frozen, Ca2+-Activated Contracting Insect Flight Muscle , 1999, Cell.

[9]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  On the working stroke elicited by steps in length and temperature. , 1998, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[10]  H. Huxley Sliding filaments and molecular motile systems. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  M. Irving,et al.  Dynamic measurement of myosin light-chain-domain tilt and twist in muscle contraction , 1999, Nature.

[12]  X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy from Lethocerus flight muscle partially relaxed by adenylylimidodiphosphate and ethylene glycol. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  A. Huxley Muscular contraction. Review lecture , 1974 .

[14]  S M Block,et al.  Fifty Ways to Love Your Lever: Myosin Motors , 1996, Cell.

[15]  Myosin structure and function. , 1995, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[16]  Stefan Highsmith Lever arm model of force generation by actin-myosin-ATP. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[17]  K C Holmes,et al.  Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[18]  C. Franzini-armstrong,et al.  Structure and periodicities of cross-bridges in relaxation, in rigor, and during contractions initiated by photolysis of caged Ca2+. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Y. Amemiya,et al.  X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy from Lethocerus flight muscle partially relaxed by adenylylimidodiphosphate and ethylene glycol. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R A Milligan,et al.  Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. , 1993, Science.

[21]  A. Huxley,et al.  Structural Changes in Muscle During Contraction: Interference Microscopy of Living Muscle Fibres , 1954, Nature.

[22]  M. Irving,et al.  Fluorescence polarization transients from rhodamine isomers on the myosin regulatory light chain in skeletal muscle fibers. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[23]  M. Irving,et al.  Steady-state fluorescence polarization studies of the orientation of myosin regulatory light chains in single skeletal muscle fibers using pure isomers of iodoacetamidotetramethylrhodamine. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[24]  K. Holmes,et al.  The structural basis of muscle contraction. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  James A. Spudich,et al.  Myosin subfragment-1 is sufficient to move actin filaments in vitro , 1987, Nature.

[26]  D. W. Hayden,et al.  The mechanism of force generation in myosin: a disorder-to-order transition, coupled to internal structural changes. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Y. Goldman,et al.  Wag the Tail: Structural Dynamics of Actomyosin , 1998, Cell.

[28]  K. Holmes,et al.  Muscle proteins--their actions and interactions. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  H. Huxley,et al.  Changes in the Cross-Striations of Muscle during Contraction and Stretch and their Structural Interpretation , 1954, Nature.

[30]  Independent mobility of catalytic and regulatory domains of myosin heads. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J Langowski,et al.  Modulation of intramolecular interactions in superhelical DNA by curved sequences: a Monte Carlo simulation study. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Amber L. Wells,et al.  The kinetic mechanism of myosin V. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  Elastic distortion of myosin heads and repriming of the working stroke in muscle , 1995, Nature.

[34]  K. Holmes,et al.  Induced Changes in Orientation of the Cross-Bridges of Glycerinated Insect Flight Muscle , 1965, Nature.

[35]  J. Corrie,et al.  Fluorescence polarization of skeletal muscle fibers labeled with rhodamine isomers on the myosin heavy chain. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[36]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  Changes in conformation of myosin heads during the development of isometric contraction and rapid shortening in single frog muscle fibres , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Structure of the regulatory domain of scallop myosin at 2 A resolution: implications for regulation. , 1996, Structure.

[38]  M. Irving,et al.  Transients of fluorescence polarization in skeletal muscle fibers labeled with rhodamine on the regulatory light chain. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[39]  R. Goody,et al.  The nature of the actin cross-bridge interaction. , 1984, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[40]  M. Reedy,et al.  Tomographic Three-dimensional Reconstruction of Insect Flight Muscle Partially Relaxed by AMPPNP and Ethylene Glycol , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  T. Irving,et al.  X-ray diffraction indicates that active cross-bridges bind to actin target zones in insect flight muscle. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[42]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.

[43]  John Trinick,et al.  Two-headed binding of a processive myosin to F-actin , 2000, Nature.

[44]  E. Gorter,et al.  Muscular Contraction , 1926, Nature.

[45]  K. Holmes The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction , 1997, Current Biology.

[46]  H. Sweeney,et al.  The ADP release step of the smooth muscle cross-bridge cycle is not directly associated with force generation. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[47]  T Duke,et al.  Cooperativity of myosin molecules through strain-dependent chemistry. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  J. Spudich,et al.  Movement of myosin-coated fluorescent beads on actin cables in vitro , 1983, Nature.

[49]  A. Fisher,et al.  Structural studies of myosin:nucleotide complexes: a revised model for the molecular basis of muscle contraction. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[50]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Single molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  S. Rosenfeld,et al.  Kinetic Tuning of Myosin via a Flexible Loop Adjacent to the Nucleotide Binding Pocket* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  J. Spudich,et al.  The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Atomic Structure of Scallop Myosin Subfragment S1 Complexed with MgADP A Novel Conformation of the Myosin Head , 1999, Cell.

[54]  Michael Whittaker,et al.  A 35-Å movement of smooth muscle myosin on ADP release , 1995, Nature.

[55]  R. Vale,et al.  The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. , 2000, Science.

[56]  D A Winkelmann,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. , 1993, Science.

[57]  Kenneth A. Taylor,et al.  Electron Tomography of Insect Flight Muscle in Rigor and AMPPNP at 23°C , 1996 .

[58]  M. Ferenczi,et al.  Muscle force is generated by myosin heads stereospecifically attached to actin , 1997, Nature.

[59]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[60]  K. Trybus,et al.  Myosin conformational states determined by single fluorophore polarization. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Malcolm Irving,et al.  Tilting of the light-chain region of myosin during step length changes and active force generation in skeletal muscle , 1995, Nature.

[62]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex , 1990, Nature.

[63]  Daniel Safer,et al.  Myosin VI is an actin-based motor that moves backwards , 1999, Nature.

[64]  J. Hoxie,et al.  CD4-independent association between HIV-1 gp120 and CXCR4: functional chemokine receptors are expressed in human neurons , 1997, Current Biology.

[65]  K. Trybus,et al.  Chimeric Substitutions of the Actin-binding Loop Activate Dephosphorylated but Not Phosphorylated Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Single-motor mechanics and models of the myosin motor. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[67]  A. Bobkov,et al.  Effects of SH1 and SH2 modifications on myosin: similarities and differences. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[68]  R. T. Tregear,et al.  Interpretation of the low angle X-ray diffraction from insect flight muscle in rigor , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[69]  I. Rayment,et al.  Is myosin a "back door" enzyme? , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[70]  K. Trybus,et al.  Loop I can modulate ADP affinity, ATPase activity, and motility of different scallop myosins : Transient kinetic analysis of S1 isoforms , 1998 .

[71]  C. Franzini-armstrong,et al.  Structural changes in muscle crossbridges accompanying force generation , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[72]  A. Huxley,et al.  Proposed Mechanism of Force Generation in Striated Muscle , 1971, Nature.

[73]  Roberto Dominguez,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Vertebrate Smooth Muscle Myosin Motor Domain and Its Complex with the Essential Light Chain Visualization of the Pre–Power Stroke State , 1998, Cell.

[74]  H M Holden,et al.  X-ray structures of the myosin motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum complexed with MgADP.BeFx and MgADP.AlF4-. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[75]  J. Telleria [Mechanism of muscular contraction]. , 1951, Medicina.

[76]  I. Rayment,et al.  X-ray structures of the MgADP, MgATPgammaS, and MgAMPPNP complexes of the Dictyostelium discoideum myosin motor domain. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[77]  K M Trybus,et al.  Loop I can modulate ADP affinity, ATPase activity, and motility of different scallop myosins. Transient kinetic analysis of S1 isoforms. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[78]  W H Guilford,et al.  Two heads of myosin are better than one for generating force and motion. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  R. T. Tregear,et al.  Movement and force produced by a single myosin head , 1995, Nature.