Design for construction: utilizing production experiences in development

The design process has a significant impact on the performance and profitability of a housing project. Therefore, decisions made during the design process should take into consideration knowledge and experience from other processes in previously accomplished projects, specifically from the production phase. How to capture and use production experience in housing has not gained enough interest, possibly leading to sub-optimal improvements during the construction process. This motivates research on how onsite production experience from similar previous projects can be captured and used to improve constructability without risking customer values. Based on the concept of constructability, ‘design for manufacturing and assembly’ and the theory of waste, the method ‘design for construction’ (DFC) has been developed. The four-step model complements the conventional construction process, and consists of the following steps: (1) specify customer values and similar previous projects; (2) identify onsite waste and cost drivers in previous projects; (3) develop criteria to evaluate constructability; and (4) evaluate constructability of the design. The DFC method is exemplified and tested through a case study, in which it was shown that the method facilitated identification of all problems that were considered in the investigated project. The method also highlighted other project obstacles that potentially could have been solved to improve constructability.

[1]  Graham Winch,et al.  Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction , 2003 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[4]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Benchmarking design‐build procurement systems in construction , 2004 .

[5]  Paul M. Goodrum,et al.  Analysis of craft workers' and foremen's perceptions of the factors affecting construction labour productivity , 2007 .

[6]  Per-Erik Josephson,et al.  Swedish construction culture, management and collaborative quality practice , 2002 .

[7]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[8]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Constructability improvement during field operations , 1988 .

[9]  Donovan R. Hardenbrook,et al.  Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You! by Michael Kennedy, Kent Harmon, and Ed Minnock , 2009 .

[10]  C. Anumba,et al.  Conceptual framework for live capture and reuse of project knowledge , 2003 .

[11]  R. Eugene Goodson,et al.  Read a plant-fast , 2002 .

[12]  W. Bodmer.  Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[13]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge , 2010 .

[14]  John Meiling,et al.  Defects in offsite construction: timber module prefabrication , 2009 .

[15]  J. Barlow,et al.  From Craft Production to Mass Customisation. Innovation Requirements for the UK Housebuilding Industry , 1999 .

[16]  John Meiling,et al.  Feedback in industrialised housing, why does it not happen? , 2008 .

[17]  Stephen Fox,et al.  How building design imperatives constrain construction productivity and quality , 2002 .

[18]  Delio Ignacio Castaneda,et al.  From Individual Learning to Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[19]  Lena Aggestam,et al.  LEARNING ORGANIZATION OR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT – WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? , 2015 .

[20]  Anne-Françoise Cutting-Decelle,et al.  Concurrent Engineering in Construction Projects , 2007 .

[21]  David Gann,et al.  Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan , 1996 .

[22]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities , 2006 .

[23]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  Enhancing knowledge exchange through web map-based knowledge management system in construction: Lessons learned in Taiwan , 2006 .

[24]  David Bryde,et al.  Is construction different? A comparison of perceptions of project management performance and practices by business sector and project type , 2008 .

[25]  Nick Rich,et al.  The seven value stream mapping tools , 1997 .

[26]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Assessing the suitability of current briefing practices in construction within a concurrent engineering framework , 2001 .

[27]  G. Anand,et al.  Benchmarking the benchmarking models , 2008 .

[28]  Christine Wall,et al.  Craft versus industry: the division of labour in European housing construction , 2000 .

[29]  A. Stinchcombe.  Stratification and Organization: Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: a comparative study , 1959 .

[30]  George Jergeas,et al.  Benefits of Constructability on Construction Projects , 2001 .

[31]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[32]  Graham Winch,et al.  Towards a theory of construction as production by projects , 2006 .

[33]  Bambang Trigunarsyah,et al.  Constructability improvement in seawater intake structure , 2011 .

[34]  Masataka Yoshimura,et al.  Concurrent Design and Evaluation Based on Structural Optimization using Structural and Function-oriented Elements at the Conceptual Design Phase , 2005, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[35]  Jouni Similä,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Managerial view on design for manufacturing , 2017 .

[36]  Alemu Moges Belay.  Design for Manufacturability and Concurrent Engineering for Product Development , 2009 .

[37]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[38]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  CONSTRUCTABILITY RELATED TO TQM, VALUE ENGINEERING, AND COST/BENEFITS , 1994 .

[39]  Richard P. Haigh,et al.  Tacit knowledge and organisational performance: construction industry perspective , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Mohd Saleh Jaafar,et al.  Evaluation of the engineer’s personnel’s role in enhancing the project constructability , 1999 .

[41]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  The case for case studies in management research , 2003 .

[42]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Collecting Constructability Improvement Ideas , 1986 .

[43]  John Meiling,et al.  Towards a feedback model for off-site construction , 2009 .

[44]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[45]  Masaaki Imai,et al.  Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management , 1997 .

[46]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[47]  Povl Erik Jensen,et al.  A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization , 2005 .

[48]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Dispute causation: identification of pathogenic influences in construction. | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2010 .

[49]  Per-Erik Josephson,et al.  Illustrative Benchmarking Rework and Rework Costs in Swedish Construction Industry , 2002 .

[50]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Improving building project performance: how buildability benchmarking can help , 2009 .

[51]  Nabil Kartam,et al.  A project control process in pre‐construction phases , 2005 .

[52]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  EMPIRICAL STUDY OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES , 2007 .

[53]  Rajat Roy,et al.  Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building , 2005 .

[54]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Concurrent engineering: a multi‐disciplinary approach for construction , 1998 .

[55]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Constructability Concepts for Engineering and Procurement , 1987 .

[56]  Swee C. Goh,et al.  Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..