Effects of concurrent physical and cognitive demands on arm movement kinematics in a repetitive upper-extremity precision task.

The effect of concurrent physical and cognitive demands on arm motor control is poorly understood. This exploratory study compared movement kinematics in a repetitive high-precision pipetting task with and without additional concurrent cognitive demands in the form of instructions necessary to locate the correct target tube. Thirty-five healthy female subjects performed a standardized pipetting task, transferring liquid repeatedly from one pick-up tube to different target tubes. In the reference condition, lights indicated the target tube in each movement cycle, while the target tube had to be deciphered from a row and column number on a computer screen in the condition with additional cognitive demands. Kinematics of the dominant arm was assessed using the central tendency and variability of the pipette-tip end-point trajectory and joint kinematics properties of the shoulder and elbow. Movements slowed down (lower velocities and higher area under the movement curves) and trajectory variability increased in the condition with additional cognitive demands, but there were no changes in the kinematics properties such as joint range of motion, times of acceleration and deceleration (as indicated by the time to peak velocity), average angles, or phase relationships between angle and angular velocity of shoulder or elbow movements between the two conditions. Further, there were also no differences in the size or structure of variability of the shoulder and elbow joint angles, suggesting that subjects could maintain the motor repertoire unaltered in the presence of these specific additional cognitive demands. Further studies should address motor control at other levels of concurrent cognitive demands, and with motor tasks that are less automated than the pipetting task used in the present study, so as to gain an increased understanding of the effect of concurrent cognitive demands for other activities of relevance to daily life.

[1]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck–shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work. , 2015, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Dual-tasking postural control: Aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[5]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[6]  P Madeleine,et al.  Changes in the amount and structure of motor variability during a deboning process are associated with work experience and neck-shoulder discomfort. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[8]  J. Zbilut,et al.  2 Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , 2004 .

[9]  A. Pohlmeyer,et al.  Walking variability and working-memory load in aging: a dual-process account relating cognitive control to motor control performance. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[10]  Pascal Madeleine,et al.  Muscle coordination and force variability during static and dynamic tracking tasks. , 2011, Human movement science.

[11]  M. Turvey,et al.  Variability and Determinism in Motor Behavior , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Slobodan Jaric,et al.  Coordination of hand grip and load forces in uni- and bidirectional static force production tasks , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  P Madeleine,et al.  On functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck–shoulder region , 2010, Acta physiologica.

[14]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  Nonlinear metrics assessing motor variability in a standardized pipetting task: Between- and within-subject variance components. , 2015, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  K. Newell,et al.  Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  A. Geurts,et al.  Dual-task assessment of reorganization of postural control in persons with lower limb amputation. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Optimal Movement Variability: A New Theoretical Perspective for Neurologic Physical Therapy , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[18]  Hannu Oja,et al.  Multivariate spatial sign and rank methods , 1995 .

[19]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  The combined influence of task accuracy and pace on motor variability in a standardised repetitive precision task , 2015, Ergonomics.

[21]  P. Baltes,et al.  Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[22]  Tom Chau,et al.  Managing variability in the summary and comparison of gait data , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  C. Shea,et al.  The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  H. Oja Multivariate Generalized Spatial Signed-Rank Methods Jyrki Möttönen 1 University of Tampere , 2004 .

[26]  Normand Teasdale,et al.  Effects of a reaction time task on postural control in humans , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  C L Webber,et al.  Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  The size and structure of arm movement variability decreased with work pace in a standardised repetitive precision task , 2015, Ergonomics.

[29]  K. Newell,et al.  Visual information gain and the regulation of constant force levels , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Walking is more like catching than tapping: gait in the elderly as a complex cognitive task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  R. Emmerik,et al.  A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[33]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Preparatory Processes and Compensatory Effort in Older and Younger Participants in a Driving-Like Dual Task , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[34]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[35]  G. Logan Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. , 1985 .

[36]  Gérome C. Gauchard,et al.  Added cognitive load through rotary auditory stimulation can improve the quality of postural control in the elderly , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[37]  C. Shea,et al.  Attention and Motor Performance: Preferences for and Advantages of an External Focus , 2001, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[38]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Healthy mind in healthy body? A review of sensorimotor–cognitive interdependencies in old age , 2006, European Review of Aging and Physical Activity.

[39]  S. Mathiassen,et al.  Motor variability in occupational health and performance. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[40]  D. Sternad,et al.  Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[41]  Xingda Qu Uncontrolled manifold analysis of gait variability: effects of load carriage and fatigue. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[42]  M. Riley,et al.  Inverse relation between postural variability and difficulty of a concurrent short-term memory task , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[43]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Joint angle variability in 3D bimanual pointing: uncontrolled manifold analysis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[45]  Julie N Côté,et al.  Adaptations to neck/shoulder fatigue and injuries. , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[46]  L. Riby,et al.  The effects of age and task domain on dual task performance: A meta-analysis , 2004 .

[47]  Yohsuke R. Miyamoto,et al.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Charles L. Webber,et al.  Recurrence Quantification Analysis , 2015 .

[49]  W H Brouwer,et al.  Divided Attention in Experienced Young and Older Drivers: Lane Tracking and Visual Analysis in a Dynamic Driving Simulator , 1991, Human factors.

[50]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor variability is not noise, but grist for the learning mill , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Differences in multi-joint kinematic patterns of repetitive hammering in healthy, fatigued and shoulder-injured individuals. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[52]  Hannu Oja,et al.  Multivariate Nonparametric Tests , 2004 .

[53]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task , 2008, Ergonomics.

[54]  K. Newell,et al.  Noise, information transmission, and force variability. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.