Effect of face familiarity on age decision.

The present experiment was planned to check whether the extraction of apparent age is affected by face identity (familiarity) or not. According to the traditional view, age estimation should be carried out independently of face identity, because it is one of the visually derived semantic codes (like gender and ethnicity). However, little is known about its underlying mechanisms. Moreover, some recent studies have cast doubt on the parallel thesis regarding facial expression, facial speech, ethnicity, and gender. Given the promising results of a pilot experiment (n=24), 16 Caucasian participants were enrolled in an "age decision" task on morphed faces derived from one old and one young source-face, in the proportion 70:30. The respondents had previously been familiarised with half the source faces by a learning procedure (associating the face, surname, occupation and city of residence of the person displayed), while the remaining half were unfamiliar. The results showed that age decision was affected by face familiarity, at least when the task was perceptually difficult enough. This adds support to the thesis that the identification of identity and the extraction of visually derived semantic codes are not made independently from each other. The status of age, within the visually derived semantic codes, is also discussed.

[1]  Jean-Yves Baudouin,et al.  When the smile is a cue to familiarity , 2000, Memory.

[2]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Age decisions on familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1991, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  E. S. Beyn,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF PROSOPAGNOSIA , 1962 .

[4]  G. Tiberghien,et al.  Recognizing expression from familiar and unfamiliar faces , 2000 .

[5]  F. Newell,et al.  Categorical perception of sex occurs in familiar but not unfamiliar faces , 2004 .

[6]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  The effects of happy and angry expressions on identity and expression memory for unfamiliar faces , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[7]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Ethnic Categorisation of Faces is Not Independent of Face Identity , 2004, Perception.

[8]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  L. Bäckman,et al.  Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A M Burton,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The involvement of the “fusiform face area” in processing facial expression , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Crommelinck,et al.  Effect of Familiarity on the Processing of Human Faces , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  S Brédart,et al.  An ‘Other-Race’ Effect in Age Estimation from Faces , 2001, Perception.

[18]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[21]  I. Gloning,et al.  A case of "prosopagnosia" with necropsy findings. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[24]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Heterogeneity in the cognitive manifestations of prosopagnosia: The study of a group of single cases , 1993 .

[26]  F Michel,et al.  [Prosopagnosia without hemianopsia after unilateral right occipitotemporal lesion]. , 1986, Revue neurologique.

[27]  A. Chrysochoos,et al.  Categorical perception of facial gender information: Behavioural evidence and the face-space metaphor , 2001 .

[28]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  J Sergent,et al.  From covert to overt recognition of faces in a prosopagnosic patient. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[31]  A. O'Toole,et al.  An ‘other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex , 1996, Perception.

[32]  E. Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[33]  Tim Valentine,et al.  An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a ‘face space’ model of face recognition , 2002 .

[34]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Is sex categorization from faces really parallel to face recognition? , 2002 .

[35]  H. Ellis,et al.  Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  E. Renzi,et al.  Right posterior brain-damaged patients are poor at assessing the age of a face , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  W. Ritchie Russell,et al.  Dissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere , 1969 .

[38]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Young and old faces in young and old heads: the factor of age in face recognition. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[39]  A. Damasio,et al.  Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity , 1988, Neurology.

[40]  J. Sergent,et al.  Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.