Efficient and feasible state tomography of quantum many-body systems

We present a novel method for performing quantum state tomography for many-particle systems, which are particularly suitable for estimating the states in lattice systems such as of ultra-cold atoms in optical lattices. We show that the need to measure a tomographically complete set of observables can be overcome by letting the state evolve under some suitably chosen random circuits followed by the measurement of a single observable. We generalize known results about the approximation of unitary two-designs, i.e. certain classes of random unitary matrices, by random quantum circuits and connect our findings to the theory of quantum compressed sensing. We show that for ultra-cold atoms in optical lattices established experimental techniques such as optical super-lattices, laser speckles and time-of-flight measurements are sufficient to perform fully certified, assumption-free tomography. This is possible without the need to address single sites in any step of the procedure. Combining our approach with tensor network methods—in particular, the theory of matrix product states—we identify situations where the effort of reconstruction is even constant in the number of lattice sites, allowing, in principle, to perform tomography on large-scale systems readily available in present experiments.

[1]  D. Stamper-Kurn,et al.  Ultracold atoms in a tunable optical kagome lattice. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[2]  D. Burgarth,et al.  Quantum system identification. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[3]  B. Collins,et al.  Integration with Respect to the Haar Measure on Unitary, Orthogonal and Symplectic Group , 2004, math-ph/0402073.

[4]  D. Gross,et al.  Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.

[5]  M. Lukin,et al.  Quantum Many-Body Dynamics of Coupled Double-Well Superlattices , 2008, 0803.1643.

[6]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum computation over continuous variables , 1998 .

[7]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[8]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Matrix product density operators: simulation of finite-temperature and dissipative systems. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[9]  Experimental study of the transport of coherent interacting matter-waves in a 1D random potential induced by laser speckle , 2006, cond-mat/0606015.

[10]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Mixed-state dynamics in one-dimensional quantum lattice systems: a time-dependent superoperator renormalization algorithm. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[11]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The Power of Convex Relaxation: Near-Optimal Matrix Completion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  J. Eisert,et al.  Probing local relaxation of cold atoms in optical superlattices , 2008, 0808.3779.

[13]  Fisher,et al.  Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[14]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms , 2002, Nature.

[15]  R. Lathe Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[16]  I. Bloch,et al.  Controlling and detecting spin correlations of ultracold atoms in optical lattices. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[17]  Stephen Becker,et al.  Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[18]  G M D'Ariano,et al.  Quantum tomography for measuring experimentally the matrix elements of an arbitrary quantum operation. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[19]  O. Gühne,et al.  03 21 7 2 3 M ar 2 00 6 Scalable multi-particle entanglement of trapped ions , 2006 .

[20]  J. Eisert,et al.  Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review , 2008, 0808.3773.

[21]  P. Zoller,et al.  Noise- and disorder-resilient optical lattices , 2012, 1205.6189.

[22]  J. Eisert,et al.  Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional Bose gas , 2011, Nature Physics.

[23]  D. Gross,et al.  Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs , 2006, quant-ph/0611002.

[24]  J. Cirac,et al.  Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation , 2012, Nature Physics.

[25]  C. Herrero,et al.  Path-integral simulation of solids , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[26]  Robert Jördens,et al.  A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice , 2008, Nature.

[27]  S. Flammia,et al.  Random unitary maps for quantum state reconstruction , 2009, 0912.2101.

[28]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[29]  P. Zoller,et al.  Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[30]  J. Dalibard,et al.  Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases , 2012, Nature Physics.

[31]  A. Harrow,et al.  Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate 2-designs , 2008, 0802.1919.

[32]  E. Demler,et al.  Measuring entanglement entropy of a generic many-body system with a quantum switch. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[33]  A. G. White,et al.  Ancilla-assisted quantum process tomography. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[34]  A. Pelster,et al.  Visibility of cold atomic gases in optical lattices for finite temperatures , 2008, 0809.0771.

[35]  David Gross,et al.  Recovering Low-Rank Matrices From Few Coefficients in Any Basis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[36]  R. Kosut,et al.  Efficient measurement of quantum dynamics via compressive sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.