Time-domain modeling, characterization, and measurements of anechoic and semi-anechoic electromagnetic test chambers

We present time-domain techniques for modeling, characterizing, and measuring anechoic and semi-anechoic chambers used for emission and immunity testing of digital devices. The finite difference time-domain (FDTD) approach is used to model and characterize these chambers. In the FDTD model presented here, we discuss methods used to eliminate the need to spatially resolve the fine detail of the absorbing structures; present a differential-operator approach for incorporating both frequency-dependent permittivity and permeability into the time domain; and discuss the effects of gaps and holes in ferrite-tile absorbers on both absorber and chamber performance. Comparisons of the FDTD chamber model with measured data for different chamber sizes are presented. Finally, we discuss and illustrate how time-domain techniques can be used to characterize chambers, predict performance, and diagnose problems with both absorbers and chambers. With time-domain and frequency-domain techniques, we show how the performance of chambers can be significantly altered with only small changes in the type of absorbing structure used, and we illustrate how undesirable modal field distributions can occur inside a chamber when a nonoptimal absorber is used.

[1]  G. Thiele,et al.  Antenna theory and design , 1981 .

[2]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  On the use of fitting models for the time-domain analysis of problems with frequency-dependent parameters , 2001, 2001 IEEE EMC International Symposium. Symposium Record. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (Cat. No.01CH37161).

[3]  Albert Smith,et al.  Calculation of Site Attenuation from Antenna Factors , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  R. Luebbers,et al.  The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[5]  J. D. Gavenda.  Semi-anechoic chamber site attenuation calculations (EM waves) , 1990 .

[6]  R. E. Pratt.  The path loss observed over a height scan yields insight into the nature of imperfections in the test environment used for the measurement of emissions , 1997, IEEE 1997, EMC, Austin Style. IEEE 1997 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.97CH36113).

[7]  E. Vitásek.  Solution of Partial Differential Equations by the Finite-Difference Method , 1994 .

[8]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Analysis of singly and doubly periodic absorbers by frequency-domain finite-difference method , 1996 .

[9]  R. T. Johnk,et al.  Electrical material properties from a free-space time-domain RF absorber reflectivity measurement system , 1997, IEEE 1997, EMC, Austin Style. IEEE 1997 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.97CH36113).

[10]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  Modeling semi-anechoic electromagnetic measurement chambers , 1996 .

[11]  Daniël De Zutter,et al.  Low-frequency reflectivity approximation for two- and three-dimensional EM absorbers , 1999 .

[12]  Tetsuya Mizumoto,et al.  Effect of the ferrite tiles gap on ferrite electromagnetic wave absorber , 1995, Proceedings of International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  G. Mur.  Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Finite-Difference Approximation of the Time-Domain Electromagnetic-Field Equations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  Robert T. Johnk,et al.  Evaluation of an EMC Compliance Chamber Using an Ultrawideband Measurement System | NIST , 2000 .

[15]  S. Shtrikman,et al.  A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Effective Magnetic Permeability of Multiphase Materials , 1962 .

[16]  K. Yee.  Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[17]  Robert T. Johnk,et al.  Low-frequency RF absorber performance with in situ and moveable sample techniques , 1998, 1998 IEEE EMC Symposium. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.98CH36253).

[18]  G. Smith,et al.  Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods , 1978 .

[19]  Dennis G. Camell,et al.  Exploring Site Quality Above 1 GHz Using Double Ridged Horns | NIST , 2001 .

[20]  C.L. Holloway,et al.  Effective electromagnetic material properties for alternating wedges and hollow pyramidal absorbers , 1997, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1997. Digest.

[21]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[22]  A. Taflove,et al.  Numerical Solution of Steady-State Electromagnetic Scattering Problems Using the Time-Dependent Maxwell's Equations , 1975 .

[23]  Kefeng Liu.  Analysis of the effect of ferrite tile gap on EMC chamber having ferrite absorber walls , 1996, Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[24]  A. Scarlatti,et al.  An equivalent transmission-line model containing dispersion for high-speed digital lines-with an FDTD implementation , 2001 .

[25]  Robert T. Johnk,et al.  Time-Domain Anechoic Chamber Site Attenuation in Low-Frequency Ferrite Tile Chambers | NIST , 1999 .

[26]  P. Valentino,et al.  Evaluating semi-anechoic rooms using an accurate and ultra-repeatable source , 2001, 2001 IEEE EMC International Symposium. Symposium Record. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (Cat. No.01CH37161).

[27]  T. Ellam.  An update on the design and synthesis of compact absorber for EMC chamber applications , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[28]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  Time-domain free-space evaluations of urethane slabs with finite-difference time-domain computer simulations , 1998, 1998 IEEE EMC Symposium. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.98CH36253).

[29]  C. Holloway,et al.  A low-frequency model for wedge or pyramid absorber arrays-I: theory , 1994 .

[30]  P. A. Langsford,et al.  Measurement of anechoic chamber reflections by time-domain techniques , 1988 .

[31]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  Comparison of electromagnetic absorber used in anechoic and semi-anechoic chambers for emissions and immunity testing of digital devices , 1997 .

[32]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  A model for predicting the reflection coefficient for hollow pyramidal absorbers , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261).

[33]  C. Holloway,et al.  A low-frequency model for wedge or pyramid absorber arrays-II: computed and measured results , 1994 .

[34]  Motohisa Kanda,et al.  Bistatic scattering of absorbing materials from 30 to 1000 MHz , 1992 .

[35]  Robert T. Johnk,et al.  Time- and Frequency-Domain Analysis of EMC Test Facilities | NIST , 2001 .

[36]  Edward F. Kuester,et al.  Comparison of approximations for effective parameters of artificial dielectrics , 1990 .

[37]  Christopher L. Holloway,et al.  The effects of gaps in ferrite tiles on both absorber and chamber performance , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatability. Symposium Record (Cat. No.99CH36261).